Bug 1917803

Summary:	[sig-storage] Pod Disks should be able to delete a non-existent PD without error
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Nikolaos Leandros Moraitis <nmoraiti>
Component:	Storage	Assignee:	Jan Safranek <jsafrane>
Storage sub component:	Storage	QA Contact:	Qin Ping <piqin>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	Docs Contact:
Severity:	medium
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	aos-bugs, jsafrane
Version:	4.7
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	4.7.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:	[sig-storage] Pod Disks should be able to delete a non-existent PD without error
Last Closed:	2021-02-24 15:54:42 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nikolaos Leandros Moraitis 2021-01-19 12:04:49 UTC

test:
[sig-storage] Pod Disks should be able to delete a non-existent PD without error 

is failing frequently in CI, see search results:
https://search.ci.openshift.org/?maxAge=168h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job&search=%5C%5Bsig-storage%5C%5D+Pod+Disks+should+be+able+to+delete+a+non-existent+PD+without+error


https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-gcp-4.7/1351451506930356224

Comment 1 Scott Dodson 2021-01-19 12:51:31 UTC

Nikolas, please file these against the components with the failing test rather than the job that had the failure.

Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2021-01-19 17:31:15 UTC

> https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-gcp-4.7/1351451506930356224

This contains only "Failed to setup provider config for "gce": Error building GCE/GKE provider: unexpected response listing zones: googleapi: Error 403: Quota exceeded for quota group 'ListGroup' and limit 'List requests per 100 seconds' of service 'compute.googleapis.com' for consumer 'project_number:1053217076791'., rateLimitExceeded". 

I checked the other issues in linked search, it's the usual set of "rateLimitExceeded", "connection refused", "watch closed before UntilWithoutRetry timeout", "i/o timeout" and so on that we track in bug #1890131.

What's new here is:

fail [k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/pd.go:84]: Requires at least 2 nodes
Expected
    <int>: 1
to be >=
    <int>: 2

The test should be skipped on 2 node cluster.

Comment 3 Jan Safranek 2021-01-19 17:36:09 UTC

Posted PR upstream: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/compare/master...jsafrane:skip-2node?expand=1

Comment 4 Jan Safranek 2021-02-02 15:13:59 UTC

Downstream: https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/546

Comment 6 Qin Ping 2021-02-03 08:38:51 UTC

Hi Jan,

Could you please help submit a PR to origin repo? Thanks!

Comment 7 Jan Safranek 2021-02-03 15:57:30 UTC

Thanks for heads-up, I created https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/25852

Comment 9 Qin Ping 2021-02-05 07:14:21 UTC

Verified with the following test log:

skip [k8s.io/kubernetes.0/test/e2e/storage/pd.go:76]: Requires at least 2 nodes (not 0)

skipped: (1.7s) 2021-01-31T21:02:55 "[sig-storage] Pod Disks should be able to delete a non-existent PD without error [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]"

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2021-02-24 15:54:42 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.7.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5633

Comment 13 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 00:58:35 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days