Bug 1918078
| Summary: | Review Request: luit - Locale and ISO 2022 support for Unicode terminals | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Jackson <ajax> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Mattia Verga <mattia.verga> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora, mattia.verga, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-03-10 14:02:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Adam Jackson
2021-01-20 01:29:15 UTC
>Source0: https://invisible-island.net/datafiles/release/luit.tar.gz This will always point to the latest release, which makes reproducing builds harder. How about using "ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net/luit/luit-%{version}.tgz" instead? >%install >rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Don't remove the buildroot at start of %install. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_tags_and_sections (In reply to Artur Frenszek-Iwicki from comment #1) > >Source0: https://invisible-island.net/datafiles/release/luit.tar.gz > This will always point to the latest release, which makes reproducing builds > harder. > How about using "ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net/luit/luit-%{version}.tgz" > instead? ftp isn't exactly a reliable step, if "reproducing the build" is an issue. I found what looks like a stable https url with the version number though. > >%install > >rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > Don't remove the buildroot at start of %install. > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_tags_and_sections Sure, done. spec and srpm updated, same URLs as above. While doing the review, I've discovered this has already been packaged by someone else: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933934 However, they use source code from X.Org which is quite old (version 1.1.1 from 2012), so you'd better coordinate with them if you want/need a newer version to be packaged. (BTW a 20210218 version is available). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1933934 *** |