Bug 1918337

Summary:	[RFE] Satellite lack of redundancy
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Rafael Cardoso <rdesouza>
Component:	Infrastructure	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.8.0	CC:	dsinglet, ehelms, jlenz, ktordeur, sajha
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	FutureFeature, RFE, Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-09-28 13:13:46 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 1 Kenny Tordeurs 2021-01-21 08:30:23 UTC

 What is the nature and description of the request?

Satellite can't combine it's setup with other Satellite. In case one Satellite in Region "A" is unreachable a Satellite in Region "B" can't assume the operations of Region "A".

Satellite is not redundant.

How to share Satellite setups among other Satellites in different locations, building a redundant environment? Capsules are not the answer since it is linked to a specific Satellite, as an example, in case a Capsule lost connectivity with Satellite "A", it can't be pointed to Satellite "B" 


- How reproducible:

In a environment with two Satellites ( A and B), if you shut off the Satellite A, capsules will not be redirected to Satellite B.


- Actual results:

Capsules or Hosts are not pointed to other Satellites, except for those which it's registered in.

- Expected results:

If a Satellite is turned off, or lose connectivity, a Capsule/Host is capable to be manageable, by other Satellite.

- Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?  
  
There are two similar but not exactly the same, however it could be useful since it could cover both needs.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068646
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102003

Comment 5 Eric Helms 2023-09-28 13:13:46 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1789905 ***