Bug 192310
Summary: | Review Request: PySyck | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael DeHaan <mdehaan> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | John Mahowald <jpmahowald> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-21 15:31:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Michael DeHaan
2006-05-18 21:06:46 UTC
Missing BuildRequires python-devel Remove Vendor tag Using Prefix for relocatable packages is strongly discouraged. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RelocatablePackages I recommend using python template from fedora-rpmdevtools package. You should also add dist tag to release in SPEC file. For that check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag Ping. Please comment in a week if you are still interested in packaging this. I notice that a blog has replaced the spec and srpm URLs. My mail filter must have missed the earlier two replies -- my apologies. Following the traffic on yaml-core for PyYAML (which is picking up considerably), I don't think packaging this is neccessary. I personally don't like the way YaML is growing in complexity, but it appears there is much more active development there in the 1.1 stuff after all -- and given that, I don't think we really want a bunch of users piling on a dead-end codebase. The application that needed this as a prereq has moved on to other serializing options. |