Bug 192417

Summary:	Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Patrice Dumas <pertusus>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Thorsten Leemhuis (ignored mailbox) <bugzilla-sink>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	opensource
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-08-25 09:47:19 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Patrice Dumas 2006-05-19 15:51:01 UTC

SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/Wcl-2.7.3-1.src.rpm
Description: 

Wcl is completely widget set independent.  It provides mechanisms to
allow an entire user interface to be specified in resource files.
Basically, this amounts to providing new resources for specifying the
types of the widgets and the widget heirarchy.  In addition, Wcl
provides several callbacks and action functions which many programs
need.

The distribution contains files which make up the Widget Creation
Library, and resource interpreters and utility libraries (which include
Table widgets) for each of the following widget sets: Athena and Motif.

Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2006-05-19 15:56:19 UTC

I modified the source quite a lot, to try to give better names to libraries:
WcXp instead of Xp and WcListTree instead of Misc.

I haven't really tested that the libraries are functionning.

Comment 2 Till Maas 2006-08-24 21:02:46 UTC

The URL to the spec file is missing.

Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2006-08-24 21:37:53 UTC

I am not convinced that this package is interesting 
enough. I have posted a spec file anyway:

http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/Wcl.spec

Are you really interested in that package being in
extras? Xbae depends on it, but only to build an example,
so maybe it should better be closed.

Comment 4 Till Maas 2006-08-24 22:11:47 UTC

I just looked into old review requests to push them forward, so go ahead and
close it.

Comment 5 Patrice Dumas 2006-08-25 09:47:19 UTC

Closing for lack of submitter interest, and certainly lack
of reviewer interest. I could reopen it if somebody is interested
in reviewing it and having it in extras.