Bug 192568
| Summary: | Review Request: perl-File-Type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Steven Pritchard <steve> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-05-23 21:50:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 163779, 192577 | ||
|
Description
Steven Pritchard
2006-05-20 20:41:26 UTC
A couple of questions: Any idea why Module::Build shows up in the final requires list and if it really needs to be there? What on Earth is the NINJA file for? Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. Text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: 4be3b0b7000b325c60351fcc8a04815d File-Type-0.22.tar.gz 4be3b0b7000b325c60351fcc8a04815d File-Type-0.22.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires are sane: perl(File::Type) = 0.22 perl(File::Type::Builder) = 0.11 perl-File-Type = 0.22-1.fc6 - perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(IO::File) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 perl(Module::Build) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=58, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.13 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.19 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. (In reply to comment #1) > Any idea why Module::Build shows up in the final requires list and if it really > needs to be there? No clue. I'm not seeing that. $ rpm -qp --requires perl-File-Type-0.22-2.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(IO::File) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 $ rpm -qp --provides perl-File-Type-0.22-2.noarch.rpm perl(File::Type) = 0.22 perl(File::Type::Builder) = 0.11 perl-File-Type = 0.22-2 Are you sure you aren't picking up BuildRequires? > What on Earth is the NINJA file for? Something that wasn't excluded, but should have been. Fixed in -2. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-File-Type-0.22-2.src.rpm For some reason I didn't see the bugzilla announcement about your comment. Sorry for not responding eariler. Thanks for excising the ninjas. I think the reasoun Module::Build showed up in the dependencies was because I somehow pulled in the requirements of the src.rpm as well; my fault. Everything looks good now. APPROVED Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. |