Bug 1928858
| Summary: | Missing image in metadata DB index.db in disconnected Operator Hub installation Compliance Operator | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Andy Bartlett <andbartl> |
| Component: | OLM | Assignee: | Kevin Rizza <krizza> |
| OLM sub component: | OLM | QA Contact: | Jian Zhang <jiazha> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | Docs Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | ||
| Priority: | high | CC: | aos-bugs, josorior, krizza, lgallett, matt, mrogers, tflannag, xiyuan |
| Version: | 4.6 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-03-24 13:18:53 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Andy Bartlett
2021-02-15 16:59:11 UTC
I don't see problems with OpenShift Image Registry there. Is it about Compliance Operator? > missing the image registry.redhat.io/openshift4/compliance-rhel8-operator-metadata@sha256:3145cda510659eee3aa12e41aefdd3e1922a6b7324f504e8613d38c258c92c44
The current published operator metadata image tag is sha256:e5a44539a1244fb63379d264007db328d346ad6afd4be371a883eec1bda7bfab, so I'm not sure where the incorrect sha comes from here. They might be referencing an outdated image cache before mirroring. Can you have them ensure they are pulling the latest from our catalog?
The bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895367 mentions that 'oc image mirror' has an issue wrt incorrect SHAs, and the comments indicate that there were fixes done on the OLM side to correct this same problem for cluster-logging. Re-assigning this to OLM. If there is something that I need to correct with the compliance-operator bundle itself, feel free to move it back, but at the moment it appears to be with OLM. |