Bug 192990

Summary: CVE-2005-2295 - netpanzer server remote DOS
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jason Tibbitts <j>
Component: netpanzerAssignee: Hugo Cisneiros <hugo>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: chris.ricker, extras-qa, fedora-security-list
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2295
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 0.8-4 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-06-14 13:18:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jason Tibbitts 2006-05-24 17:12:29 UTC
(from the CVE):
NetPanzer 0.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service
(infinite loop) via a packet with a zero datablock size.

It seems this has been fixed in upstream SVN, but no release has been made and
unfortunately upstream webSVN seems not to be responding for me.

Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2006-05-24 17:29:32 UTC
Erm, Tibs isn't this a duplicate of 192983, I understand you want to have a bug
with the CVE in the summary now that there is a CVE, but you could have just
changed the summary of 192983. I'm inclined to close this as a dup of 192983,
but Ill leave that up to you or Hugo.

Hugo let me know if you need any assistence with this one.


Comment 2 Chris Ricker 2006-05-24 17:31:57 UTC
They're two different bugs

Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2006-05-24 17:50:09 UTC
Yes, this is an older issue that I noticed when searching the CVE database for
netpanzer isues.  It has a fix in SVN although I wasn't able to extract it; the
other bug has no fix that I know of.

Comment 4 Hugo Cisneiros 2006-05-24 21:37:21 UTC
I'm currently looking this as I'm getting the updated source code from the svn 
repository. A patch and a new release will follow shortly.

Comment 5 Hugo Cisneiros 2006-06-14 13:18:46 UTC
Package fixed. Closing. Thanks!