|Summary:||FreeIPA server deployment fails in current F34 and Rawhide composes|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Adam Williamson <awilliam>|
|Component:||dogtag-pki||Assignee:||Matthew Harmsen <mharmsen>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||34||CC:||abokovoy, alee, ascheel, bcotton, edewata, gmarr, kwright, mharmsen, mkdineshprasanth, robatino|
|Fixed In Version:||dogtag-pki-10.10.5-1.fc34||Doc Type:||If docs needed, set a value|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2021-03-05 02:12:45 UTC||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Adam Williamson 2021-02-18 01:33:51 UTC
In current F34 and Rawhide, FreeIPA server deployment is failing in the same way as it is on F32 and F33 with the pending 389-ds-base updates: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e55a8d7545 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-23690b2925 See this comment from ab with some details: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e55a8d7545#comment-1883763 I'm filing a bug to track this from openQA and also to propose it as a 34 Beta blocker, because it is one, per "It must be possible to configure a Fedora Server system installed according to the above criteria as a FreeIPA domain controller, using the official deployment tools provided in the distribution FreeIPA packages" - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria#FreeIPA_server_requirements
Comment 1 Adam Williamson 2021-02-18 01:41:10 UTC
Created attachment 1757673 [details] log tarball from a failure on F34
Comment 2 Geoffrey Marr 2021-02-22 19:49:45 UTC
Discussed during the 2021-02-22 blocker review meeting:  The decision to classify this bug as an "AcceptedBlocker (Beta)" was made as it violates the following Basic criterion: "It must be possible to configure a Fedora Server system installed according to the above criteria as a FreeIPA domain controller, using the official deployment tools provided in the distribution FreeIPA packages"  https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2021-02-22/f34-blocker-review.2021-02-22-17.07.txt
Comment 3 Adam Williamson 2021-02-26 17:05:12 UTC
Any word on a fix for this? It's been broken for some time.
Comment 4 Alex Scheel 2021-03-01 14:27:22 UTC
This has been rebuilt into a side-tag for Fedora on Thursday: Side tag 'f35-build-side-37912' (id 37912) created. Side tag 'f34-build-side-37914' (id 37914) created. Side tag 'f33-build-side-37916' (id 37916) created. Side tag 'f32-build-side-37918' (id 37918) created. It includes a rebuilt 389ds package where applicable and I believe a IPA update as well. I'll let Bokovoy communicate overall state of side tag and when it will be merged. I believe there's still some discussion as to whether or not we should rebuild f34 and rawhide pki-core inside the side tag to pick up an ELN fix.
Comment 5 Adam Williamson 2021-03-01 23:10:57 UTC
I think I actually saw an update where the tests passed. Now I have to find it again. :D
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-03-02 00:08:30 UTC
FEDORA-2021-263244c071 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-263244c071
Comment 7 Alexander Bokovoy 2021-03-02 07:55:19 UTC
There are four Bodhi updates which include dogtag, 389-ds, and freeipa, all rebuilt with dependencies enforced in such a way that 389-ds CVE fix will not break them. F32: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-dc1a4934a5 F33: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7458e2d835 F34: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-263244c071 F35: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c95b836c2f
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-03-03 21:06:13 UTC
FEDORA-2021-263244c071 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 9 Ben Cotton 2021-03-03 21:27:28 UTC
Setting to ON_QA since this is an accepted blocker and we want to make sure the openQA tests pass with these updates.
Comment 10 Adam Williamson 2021-03-05 02:12:45 UTC
They did, it's fixed.