Bug 1930069
Summary: | Package needed for EPEL 7 and 8 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | nicolas.baratto |
Component: | collectd | Assignee: | Jonathan Wright <jonathan> |
Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel8 | CC: | gregswift, jskarvad, kevin, mhlavink, ruben |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
nicolas.baratto
2021-02-18 10:09:32 UTC
Well, this is a major upgrade for epel, and we try and avoid those. What do my co-maintainers think here? I am not sure if things will even build on epel7 (epel8 is more likely). This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. |