Bug 1930071

Summary:	dnsperf needs update for new bind-lib-lite
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	J. Randall Owens <jrowens.fedora>
Component:	dnsperf	Assignee:	Paul Wouters <pwouters>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	32	CC:	pemensik, pwouters
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	dnsperf-2.3.4-5.fc32	Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-03-10 00:25:38 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description J. Randall Owens 2021-02-18 10:17:55 UTC

Description of problem:
dnsperf-2.3.4-4.fc32 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), which was provided by bind-libs-lite-9.11.26-2.fc32, but the new bind-libs-lite-9.11.27-1.fc32 provides libdns.so.1113()(64bit), so bind-libs-lite upgrade is being held back by dnsperf.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dnsperf-2.3.4-4.fc32

How reproducible:
simply

Steps to Reproduce:
1. have dnsperf-2.3.4-4.fc32 & bind-libs-lite-9.11.26-2.fc32 installed
2. dnf upgrade

Actual results:
 Problem 4: package dnsperf-2.3.4-4.fc32.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.27-1.fc32.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-2.fc32.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package dnsperf-2.3.4-4.fc32.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-2.fc32.x86_64
 Problem 5: package dnsperf-data-2.3.4-4.fc32.noarch requires dnsperf = 2.3.4-4.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package dnsperf-2.3.4-4.fc32.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-2.fc32.x86_64 requires bind-license = 32:9.11.26-2.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.27-1.fc32.noarch and bind-license-32:9.11.26-2.fc32.noarch
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package dnsperf-data-2.3.4-4.fc32.noarch
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package bind-license-32:9.11.26-2.fc32.noarch
 Problem 6: package bind-utils-32:9.11.27-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1113()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package bind-utils-32:9.11.27-1.fc32.x86_64 requires bind-libs-lite(x86-64) = 32:9.11.27-1.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.27-1.fc32.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-2.fc32.x86_64
  - problem with installed package dnsperf-2.3.4-4.fc32.x86_64
  - package dnsperf-2.3.4-4.fc32.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package bind-utils-32:9.11.26-2.fc32.x86_64
 Problem 7: package bind-lite-devel-32:9.11.27-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1113()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package bind-lite-devel-32:9.11.27-1.fc32.x86_64 requires bind-libs-lite(x86-64) = 32:9.11.27-1.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.27-1.fc32.x86_64 and bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-2.fc32.x86_64
  - problem with installed package dnsperf-data-2.3.4-4.fc32.noarch
  - package dnsperf-data-2.3.4-4.fc32.noarch requires dnsperf = 2.3.4-4.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package dnsperf-2.3.4-4.fc32.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package bind-lite-devel-32:9.11.26-2.fc32.x86_64

Expected results:
upgraded bind packages

Additional info:
The libisc.so.1107()(64bit) provided by the older bind-libs-lite-9.11.26-2.fc32 remains unchanged in bind-libs-lite-9.11.27-1.fc32.
I didn't find any newer dnsperf in updates-testing, either.

Comment 1 Fedora Update System 2021-03-01 20:35:30 UTC

FEDORA-2021-f8283c17e8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f8283c17e8

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2021-03-02 16:29:58 UTC

FEDORA-2021-f8283c17e8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-f8283c17e8`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f8283c17e8

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2021-03-10 00:25:38 UTC

FEDORA-2021-f8283c17e8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.