Bug 1936210
Summary: | rbd example from the docs crashes with ceph_assert(weight == 10) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | its_rhn |
Component: | RADOS | Assignee: | Greg Farnum <gfarnum> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Manohar Murthy <mmurthy> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.2 | CC: | akupczyk, alfrgarc, astupnik, bhubbard, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, dhill, dzafman, gfarnum, jdurgin, johfulto, kchai, kdreyer, kurathod, lhh, manuel.frei, mhackett, mhicks, nojha, patrik.fuerer, pdhiran, rzarzyns, schhabdi, sseshasa, tserlin, vereddy, vumrao |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.2z1 | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ceph-14.2.11-137.el7cp ceph-14.2.11-137.el8cp | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-04-28 20:13:21 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1941272, 1942142 |
Description
its_rhn
2021-03-07 16:51:49 UTC
Red Hat OpenStack QE tests v16 with RHCSv4 (based on luminous) and we'll test it with external RHCSv5 (based on pacific) before it GAs, but we don't test downstream v16 with upstream Octopus so this isn't a configuration we support. However, there might be useful information here worth checking to make sure it is not an issue in the RHCS4 client so the product component of this bug has been switched from OpenStack to Ceph. This appears to be related to the work done in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800382 @gfarnum mind taking a look? Yep; looks like one of my safety checks busted the client against newer Ceph server releases. I can pull that out. Just to be sure, though, does this deployment do something to set monitor weights? The assert is checking that the monitor weight is set to the default, and I’m surprised anything is bothering to change those. Not that I'm aware of. Also grepping through yaml files used by tripleo and ceph-ansible for "weight" gives no hits. So I'd say it's very much default. This is now fixed in our ceph-4.2-rhel-patches branch so should go out in 4.2z1. Thanks for the report! Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat Ceph Storage security, bug fix, and enhancement Update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1452 |