Bug 1942782

Summary: Parameters specified in "Advanced Fields" are not passed to Ansible
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Jessica Hanley <jhanley>
Component: Ansible - Configuration ManagementAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Lukas Pramuk <lpramuk>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.7.0CC: ktordeur, mkorbel, oezr, rbertolj, rlavi, satellite6-bugs, smeyer
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-07-17 12:22:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jessica Hanley 2021-03-25 00:30:52 UTC 
Description of problem:

When executing an Ansible role using remote execution, the effective user, ssh password and sudo password in the "Advanced Fields" section of the remote execution page are not honored by the Ansible roles.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Satellite 6.7


Actual results:

When executing an Ansible role using remote execution, and when specifying the effective user, ssh password or sudo password in the "Advanced Fields" section of the remote execution page, Ansible roles will fail if these values are required, and if they are not specified elsewhere.


Expected results:

When executing an Ansible role using remote execution, and when specifying the effective user, ssh password or sudo password in the "Advanced Fields" section of the remote execution page, these values should be used by Ansible, and they should override values specified elsewhere.
Comment 1 Ondřej Ezr 2021-03-26 12:28:39 UTC 
Created redmine issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/32215 from this bug
Comment 2 Ondřej Ezr 2021-03-31 12:43:48 UTC 
*** Bug 1853069 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Ondřej Ezr 2021-04-06 11:49:35 UTC 
*** Bug 1605147 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 01:33:26 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 365 days