Bug 194561

Summary: Upgrade of scim-libs fails on postinstall scriptlet
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka>
Component: scimAssignee: Jens Petersen <petersen>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: eng-i18n-bugs, jko
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 1.4.4-9.4.fc5 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-06-14 04:14:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mamoru TASAKA 2006-06-14 03:51:06 UTC
Description of problem:
The newest upgrade of scim-libs (1.4.4-9.2.fc5) fails on postinstall
scriptlet. As a result, the old version of scim-libs is not deleted.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
scim-libs-1.4.4-9.3.fc5

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Upgrade scim-libs to scim-libs-1.4.4-9.3.fc5
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Upgrading scim-libs fails on postinstall scriptlet by this command:
[root@localhost ~]# /usr/bin/update-gtk-immodules i386-redhat-linux-gnu
Cannot load module /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules/im-scim.so:
/usr/lib/libscim-x11utils-1.0.so.8: undefined symbol:
_ZNSt11_7_200604288ios_base4InitC1Ev
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules/im-scim.so does not export GTK+ IM module API:
/usr/lib/libscim-x11utils-1.0.so.8: undefined symbol:
_ZNSt11_7_200604288ios_base4InitC1Ev

As a result, the old version of scim-libs is not deleted:
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -q scim-libs
scim-libs-1.4.4-9.2.fc5
scim-libs-1.4.4-9.3.fc5

Expected results:
Upgrading scim-libs should succeed.

Additional info:
This is the re-submittance of bug 194953, which seems to have disappeared 
because of bugzilla corruption.

Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2006-06-14 04:14:20 UTC
Okay, I missed the annoucement of releasing scim-1.4.4-9.4.fc5. This package
fixed this issue.

Thanks.

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2006-06-14 08:46:15 UTC
Thank you for confirming the fixed package so quickly.

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2006-06-14 08:57:37 UTC
*** Bug 194587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2006-07-05 10:47:35 UTC
*** Bug 195444 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2006-07-05 10:48:41 UTC
*** Bug 195447 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2006-07-05 10:49:31 UTC
*** Bug 195445 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***