Bug 1946688
| Summary: | fedpkg import removing <package name>.rpmlintrc. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jun Aruga <jaruga> |
| Component: | rpkg | Assignee: | Aditya Bisoi <abisoi> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | cqi, dennis, jkeating, lsedlar, onosek, otto.liljalaakso, s |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rpkg-1.63-2.fc33 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-09-09 17:45:19 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jun Aruga
2021-04-06 16:49:51 UTC
Ping? I think other packages having the <package>.rpmlintrc file also are affected by this issue. This is currently in progress. Oh thanks!! I am looking forward to seeing the updated version! This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 35 development cycle. Changing version to 35. It still happens on Fedora 34. ``` $ cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora release 34 (Thirty Four) $ rpm -q fedpkg fedpkg-1.40-6.fc34.noarch $ pwd /home/jaruga/fed/simde $ fedpkg import simde-0.7.3-1.git3378ab3.fc36.src.rpm Removing no longer used file: simde.rpmlintrc Could not execute import_srpm: (52, 'Empty reply from server') ``` The `Could not execute import_srpm: (52, 'Empty reply from server')` is not related to this issue. FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4b1bb0ee48 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4b1bb0ee48 FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8 FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. Thanks for fixing it. I am not sure why a comment for Fedora 34 by Bodhi system is not written here. But I could find the actual URL. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=fedpkg https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-55652a7b38 Yes, it is fixed in every supported fedpkg's distribution. I didn't want to spam e-mails. It produces a number of messages when BZ is linked in the Bodhi. I only linked it with f33. FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8 FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2021-20e5f8a6b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |