Bug 1948692 (CVE-2021-30500)
Summary: | CVE-2021-30500 upx: Null pointer dereference in PackLinuxElf::canUnpack() in p_lx_elf.cpp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Pedro Sampaio <psampaio> |
Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team> |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | carnil, gwync |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-04-13 00:38:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1948693, 1948694 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1948699 |
Description
Pedro Sampaio
2021-04-12 18:37:55 UTC
Created upx tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: epel-all [bug 1948693] Affects: fedora-all [bug 1948694] This CVE Bugzilla entry is for community support informational purposes only as it does not affect a package in a commercially supported Red Hat product. Refer to the dependent bugs for status of those individual community products. (In reply to Pedro Sampaio from comment #0) > Null pointer dereference was found in upx PackLinuxElf::canUnpack() in > p_lx_elf.cpp,in version UPX 4.0.0. That allow attackers to execute > arbitrary code and cause a denial of service via a crafted file. > > Upstream issue: > > https://github.com/upx/upx/issues/48 > > Upstream patch: > > https://github.com/upx/upx/commit/90279abdfcd235172eab99651043051188938dcc Should the upstream issue to b referenced be https://github.com/upx/upx/issues/485 (missing last 5 digit in the issue number instead of 48)? Yes, that's correct. |