Bug 1948943
Summary: | (release-4.8) Limit the number of collected pods in the workloads gatherer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Tomas Remes <tremes> |
Component: | Insights Operator | Assignee: | Tomas Remes <tremes> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Pavel Šimovec <psimovec> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.8 | CC: | aos-bugs, inecas, mklika, tremes |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.8.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-07-27 22:59:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tomas Remes
2021-04-13 06:38:31 UTC
At this moment it checks pods namespace by namespace. So the limit can be exceeded if we put all pods in one namespace. Otherwise, it stops collecting from other namespaces when the limit is exceeded, as expected. {"pods":5561,"imageCount":0,"images":{},"namespaces":{"N6juwc4ZaH0T":{"count":5561,"terminalCount":362,"ignoredCount":4510,"invalidCount":689,"shapes":[]},"k2lPYOlQaXUX":{"count":0,"shapes":[]}}} Update required. Moving to POST to be able to use this BZ with the openshift-ci-robot In config/workloads.json {"pods":3000,"imageCount":0,"images":{},"namespaces":{"N6juwc4ZaH0T":{"count":3000,"ignoredCount":3000,"shapes":[]}}} Now the number of pods gathered in workloads gatherer is properly limited. verified Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.8.2 bug fix and security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2438 |