Bug 1949235
| Summary: | [OCPonRHV] - machine created on status 'provisioning' instead of failed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | michal <mgold> |
| Component: | Cloud Compute | Assignee: | OCP on RHV Team <ocprhvteam> |
| Cloud Compute sub component: | oVirt Provider | QA Contact: | michal <mgold> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | Docs Contact: | |
| Severity: | low | ||
| Priority: | low | CC: | bretm, gzaidman, lleistne, mburman |
| Version: | 4.8 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-05-20 11:29:21 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Setting this as priority low since there is a limit to the amount of validations we want to add urgently... this fix will require us to check the values that are available on the ovirt engine and not that the value make sense and I'm not sure we want to get into that rabbit hole (In reply to Gal Zaidman from comment #1) > Setting this as priority low since there is a limit to the amount of > validations we want to add urgently... this fix will require us to check the > values that are available on the ovirt engine and not that the value make > sense and I'm not sure we want to get into that rabbit hole Right, should we close this one then? Nope lets just not target this one yet... We don't want to have a validation against each field that it exist in the engine |
Description of problem: machine created on status 'provisioning' instead of failed Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ocp version: 4.8.0-0.nightly-2021-04-09-222447 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1.create machineset with incorrect value on 'instance_type_id' 2. run 'oc get machines' - machine created on status 'provisioning' 3. Actual results: machine created on status 'provisioning' instead of failed with error -E0412 08:25:31.370505 1 controller.go:267] controller-runtime/manager/controller/machine_controller "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="creating Ovirt instance: Fault reason is \"Operation failed\". Fault detail is \"Invalid UUID string: MemoryMB\". HTTP response code is \"400\". HTTP response message is \"400 Bad Request\"." "name"="primary-m6qrv-worker-24-2mwkk" "namespace"="openshift-machine-api" Expected results: machine should create with a validation error and status failed Additional info: apiVersion: machine.openshift.io/v1beta1 kind: MachineSet metadata: name: primary-m6qrv-worker-38 labels: machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-cluster: primary-m6qrv machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machine-role: worker-38 machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machine-type: worker-38 spec: replicas: 1 selector: matchLabels: machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-cluster: primary-m6qrv machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machineset: primary-m6qrv-worker-38 template: metadata: labels: machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-cluster: primary-m6qrv machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machine-role: worker-38 machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machine-type: worker-38 machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machineset: primary-m6qrv-worker-38 spec: providerSpec: value: affinity_groups_names: - test1 apiVersion: ovirtproviderconfig.machine.openshift.io/v1beta1 cluster_id: 502babf8-9c05-4738-b5c9-2ac8c33a9648 credentialsSecret: name: ovirt-credentials kind: OvirtMachineProviderSpec os_disk: size_gb: 120 template_name: primary-m6qrv-rhcos instance_type_id: CPU type: server userDataSecret: name: worker-user-data