Bug 1950572

Summary:	stratis90 module prevents stratisd install
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	mulhern <amulhern>
Component:	dracut	Assignee:	Lukáš Nykrýn <lnykryn>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Frantisek Sumsal <fsumsal>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	urgent
Version:	8.5	CC:	dkeefe, dracut-maint-list, dtardon, fsumsal, stratis-team
Target Milestone:	beta	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	dracut-049-136.git20210426.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-11-09 19:38:39 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1931671

Description mulhern 2021-04-16 23:42:37 UTC

Description of problem:

Existing stratis90 module in dracut prevents installation of stratisd 2.4.0,
not yet released, which supplies its own stratis90 module.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

dracut 049, which is the version in RHEL 8.5 contains the module.
dracut 051, not in RHEL 8.5, is the first version of dracut in which the module has been removed.

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install dracut
2. Observe stratis90 dracut module in /usr/lib/dracut/modules.d

Actual results:

Module is there. dnf refuses to install stratisd with error something like:
"transaction test error": the file "/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/90stratis/module-setup.sh" conflicts with one that is in the dracut-049... package

Expected results:

Desired results: module is gone. dnf does not discover a transaction test error.

Additional info:

Upstream removal, as a model: https://github.com/dracutdevs/dracut/pull/897

Comment 1 David Tardon 2021-04-19 08:26:06 UTC

Does this mean stratisd is going to be rebased to 2.4.X in 8.5?

Comment 2 mulhern 2021-04-20 12:57:48 UTC

Yes.

Comment 3 David Tardon 2021-04-20 13:59:56 UTC

And is there already a bug for the rebase?

Comment 4 Dennis Keefe 2021-04-20 14:17:04 UTC

Rebase BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931671

Comment 5 mulhern 2021-04-20 15:05:04 UTC

I believe adding a "Blocks" link is the correct protocol.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2021-11-09 19:38:39 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (dracut bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:4394