Bug 1951964
Summary: | [Edge] add same user in both blueprint and ks file will cause edge install failure | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Yi He <yih> |
Component: | osbuild-composer | Assignee: | Image Builder team <osbuilders> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Yi He <yih> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | Eliane Ramos Pereira <elpereir> |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 8.4 | CC: | elpereir, leiwang, xiaofwan, yih |
Target Milestone: | beta | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Known Issue | |
Doc Text: |
.Adding the same username in both blueprint and Kickstart files causes Edge image installation to fail
To install a RHEL for Edge image, users must create a blueprint to build a `rhel-edge-container image` and also create a Kickstart file to install the RHEL for Edge image. When a user adds the same username, password, and SSH key in both the blueprint and the Kickstart file, the RHEL for Edge image installation fails. Currently, there is no workaround.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-11-01 07:29:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Yi He
2021-04-21 08:50:10 UTC
installer image type does not support user configuration in kickstart file. So this looks not a bug. Could you please review this bug again? Thanks. hi, in this bug, I used container to serve as edge commit repo, and then used a ks file to installer edge vm, so this bug is about the container type image,,,not the installer type image,,, Hi Eliane, I suggest that we still need to document this in 8.5, because nothing changed in 8.5 about this bug. Although I doubt that if any customer will use rhel-for-edge images in this way, but better to document it, in case if they run into this issue. After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release. Therefore, it is being closed. If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened. |