Bug 1952193

Summary:	Upgraded from nautilus to pacific - OSD(s) reporting legacy (not per-pool) BlueStore omap usage stats
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Vasishta <vashastr>
Component:	RADOS	Assignee:	Neha Ojha <nojha>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Manohar Murthy <mmurthy>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	5.0	CC:	akupczyk, bhubbard, ceph-eng-bugs, nojha, rzarzyns, sseshasa, tserlin, vumrao
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	5.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-16.2.0-12.el8cp	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-08-30 08:29:54 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Vasishta 2021-04-21 17:46:28 UTC

Description of problem:
when Cluster upgraded from nautilus to pacific (RHCS 4.x to RHCS 5.x) cluster status says OSD(s) reporting legacy (not per-pool) BlueStore omap usage stats

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
16.2.0-10.el8cp

How reproducible:
Tried once

Steps to Reproduce: (what we followed)
1. Configure a 4.x baremetal cluster
2. Migrate it to containerized cluster
3. Upgrade cluster to 5.x
4. run cephadm-adopt playbook

Actual results:
(check further comments)

Expected results:
No warnings/ cluster status should be apt

Additional info:
Tentatively selecting component as RADOS, feel free to change to ceph-ansible if ceph-ansible is missing any step

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2021-08-30 08:29:54 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.0 bug fix and enhancement), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:3294