Bug 1952241
Summary: | RFE - Increase the default IDL scan limit and evaluate the possibility of a dynamic limit. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Directory Server | Reporter: | Têko Mihinto <tmihinto> |
Component: | 389-ds-base | Assignee: | Pierre Rogier <progier> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | LDAP QA Team <idm-ds-qe-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Evgenia Martynyuk <emartyny> |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 11.2 | CC: | aadhikar, emartyny, idm-ds-dev-bugs, mreynolds, pasik, pcech, progier, vashirov |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | dirsrv-12.2 | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | redhat-ds-12-9020020230314150545.1674d574 | Doc Type: | Deprecated Functionality |
Doc Text: |
.The `nsslapd-idlistscanlimit` parameter is deprecated and its default value has been changed
With the new filter reordering optimization, the `nsslapd-idlistscanlimit` attribute impact on search performance is more harmful than helpful. As a result, the attribute is deprecated. Additionally, the default value has been changed to `2147483646` (unlimited).
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-05-30 09:40:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Têko Mihinto
2021-04-21 20:29:38 UTC
Upstream ticket: https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/2435 Build tested: 389-ds-base-2.2.7-2.module+el9dsrv+18726+78959e84.x86_64 On a default installation IDL scan limit is raised to INT_MAX: # ldapsearch -x -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w password -b cn=config | grep nsslapd-idlistscanlimit: nsslapd-idlistscanlimit: 2147483646 Marking as VERIFIED. Hi Pierre! @progier Could you please review the DoxText field with the RN draft. Thanks, Evgenia Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (redhat-ds:12 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:3344 |