Bug 1953481
| Summary: | New OCP priority classes are not used - Deploy | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Container Native Virtualization (CNV) | Reporter: | Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch> |
| Component: | Installation | Assignee: | Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Satyajit Bulage <sbulage> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 2.6.0 | CC: | cnv-qe-bugs, kmajcher, sbulage, stirabos |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | sbulage:
needinfo?
|
| Target Release: | 4.9.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | hco-bundle-registry-container-v4.9.0-43 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-11-02 15:57:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Fabian Deutsch
2021-04-26 08:36:34 UTC
In the OpenShift Virtualization Operator I saw below changes: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Virt-operator ==> priorityClassName: kubevirt-cluster-critical Cluster-network-addons-operator ==> priorityClassName: system-cluster-critical Hyperconverged-cluster-operator ==> priorityClassName: system-cluster-critical Hyperconverged-cluster-webhook ==> priorityClassName: system-node-critical SSP-operator ==> priorityClassName: system-cluster-critical ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Also, I cross-checked the PR(attached to BZ) changes. I have small question why/how 'virt-operator' has 'kubevirt-cluster-critical' priorityClass? That's a good question. @aschuett do you know? We set the virt-operator's priority class in KubeVirt. We had a long discussion about changing the priority classes[1] but ultimately decided to keep the priority classes we already had assigned[2] which is the highest a user priority level can be set to. [1] https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pull/5901 [2] https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pull/5901#issuecomment-871321387 Thanks Ashley :) for explanation. Verifying the BZ. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Virtualization 4.9.0 Images security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:4104 |