Bug 195352

Summary: sysreport's is returning a return code of 255 vice 0
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Reporter: Chris Williams <cww>
Component: sysreportAssignee: Than Ngo <than>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.0CC: eparis
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2006-0632 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-18 19:16:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 190430, 202769    

Description Chris Williams 2006-06-14 21:18:59 UTC
Description of problem:
sysreport-1.3.7.2-15 is returning a return code of 255 instead of 0.
This is causing Red Hat's HWcert INFO etst to fail.

sysreport-1.3.7.2-13 does not exhibit this behavior.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Everytime


Steps to Reproduce:
1. syreport; echo $?
2. not that 255 is returned
3.
  
Actual results:
255 is returned

Expected results:
o should be returned

Additional info:
sysreport-1.3.7.2-13 does not exhibit this problem

Comment 1 Than Ngo 2006-07-17 17:37:42 UTC
it's now fixed in rawhide. I have already commited the fix in RHEL-3 CVS

Comment 2 Than Ngo 2006-08-11 12:57:22 UTC
it's now fixed in sysreport-1.3.7.2-16 

Comment 5 Than Ngo 2006-08-12 08:19:56 UTC
it's now fixed in sysreport-1.3.7.2-17

Comment 7 Ben Levenson 2006-08-14 13:21:34 UTC
fix verified in sysreport-1.3.7.2-17

Comment 9 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-08-18 19:16:41 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0632.html