Bug 1953903
Summary: | Crush map viewer in dashboard does not displays OSD's which are not part of the ‘default’ CRUSH root | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Pawan <pdhiran> |
Component: | Ceph-Dashboard | Assignee: | avan <athakkar> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Pawan <pdhiran> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Ranjini M N <rmandyam> |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.0 | CC: | agunn, athakkar, ceph-eng-bugs, kdreyer, rmandyam, sangadi, vereddy |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 5.1 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ceph-16.2.6-1.el8cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
.The {storage-product} Dashboard displays OSDs same as the `ceph osd tree` output
Previously, the {storage-product} Dashboard considered the default CRUSH root children ignoring other CRUSH types like datacenter, zones, rack, and other types. As a result, the CRUSH map viewer on the dashboard would not display OSDs which are not part of the default CRUSH root.
With this release, the tree view of OSDs of the storage cluster on the Ceph dashboard now displays the same as the `ceph osd tree` output.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-04-04 10:20:39 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1959686, 2031073 |
Comment 8
Ken Dreyer (Red Hat)
2021-10-06 13:52:59 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.1 Security, Enhancement, and Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1174 |