Bug 195678
Summary: | Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | j, opensource |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-12-16 23:30:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 |
Description
Thomas Vander Stichele
2006-06-16 15:23:07 UTC
Due to review of rasqal, I've made some additional changes to this package. New src.rpm up at http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-i386-extras/redland-bindings-1.0.4.1-2.fc5/redland-bindings-1.0.4.1-2.fc5.src.rpm sorry, that was supposed to go in the other bug report :) This has been sitting around for a really long time; is there anything that's stopping it from being reviewed? I assume it needs redland; is that done now? There's been no response for months now, and it's been in needinfo for over a month. I will close this ticket soon if there's no response. redland is in FC-6, F-7 onwards in CVS at least, FWIW It's been another two weeks with no response; closing. So what should I do if I actually want to get this reviewed ? It seems it's just a structural problem of not being able to get reviewers for certain kinds of packages, which is a shame. I'll reopen jsut so it gets on someone's radar and someone can tell me what my options are if I want this reviewed. I don't understand how you see this as a structural problem; I was here and willing to review this package, but you failed to respond. If you want a review now, a good place to start would be to make sure the package still builds and to release any updates that are necessary. There is a newer version of the package available, please update and notice comment:10 to get this reviewed. Yes, this ticket is coming around to being closed, again, due to submitter inaction. Looks like nothing's going to happen here. Well, we tried. |