Bug 1956920

Summary: can't open terminal for pods that have more than one container running
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Samuel Padgett <spadgett>
Component: Management ConsoleAssignee: Samuel Padgett <spadgett>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Yadan Pei <yapei>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.8CC: aos-bugs, jokerman, yapei
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.8.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Fixes an error that could occur in the web console when using the terminal for a pod with multiple containers.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Version: 4.8.0-0.nightly-2021-04-30-102231 Cluster ID: 6f4e1f44-6f43-496f-ac48-f7197dcfbba0 Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/88.0
Last Closed: 2021-07-27 23:06:09 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1967106    

Description Samuel Padgett 2021-05-04 16:33:32 UTC 
Migrated from https://github.com/openshift/console/issues/8762. See the full discussion in that issue.

"When we try to open a terminal to a pod that has more than one container, we can get to a terminal for the default container but when we switch containers we receive the following error:

    Oh no! Something went wrong.
    Description:
    This API only accepts integers

The details box has the following stack trace:

vendors~main-chunk-08b0abf6231b0b9835e1.min.js:163997 Error: This API only accepts integers
    at e._verifyIntegers (vendors~main-chunk-08b0abf6231b0b9835e1.min.js:100807)
    at e.refresh (vendors~main-chunk-08b0abf6231b0b9835e1.min.js:100807)
    at Object.onConnectionClosed (303-chunk-8193ff095b2a5fbf4a73.min.js:1)
    at Object.connect_ (303-chunk-8193ff095b2a5fbf4a73.min.js:1)
    at Object.<anonymous> (303-chunk-8193ff095b2a5fbf4a73.min.js:1)
    at Ni (vendors~main-chunk-08b0abf6231b0b9835e1.min.js:163997)
    at Li (vendors~main-chunk-08b0abf6231b0b9835e1.min.js:163997)
    at vendors~main-chunk-08b0abf6231b0b9835e1.min.js:163997
    at t.unstable_runWithPriority (vendors~main-chunk-08b0abf6231b0b9835e1.min.js:164291)
    at li (vendors~main-chunk-08b0abf6231b0b9835e1.min.js:163997)"
Comment 2 Yadan Pei 2021-05-08 07:43:55 UTC 
1. Create a deploymentconfig which will deploy a pod with two containers
apiVersion: apps.openshift.io/v1
kind: DeploymentConfig
metadata:
  name: exampletest
spec:
  selector:
    app: httpd
  replicas: 1
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: httpd
    spec:
      containers:
        - name: httpd
          image: >-
            image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/openshift/httpd:latest
          ports:
            - containerPort: 8080
        - name: containertwo
          image: >-
            quay.io/openshifttest/hello-openshift@sha256:424e57db1f2e8e8ac9087d2f5e8faea6d73811f0b6f96301bc94293680897073
          ports:
          - containerPort: 8080
            protocol: TCP
          resources:
            limits:
              memory: 256Mi

$ oc get pods -n yapei2
NAME                   READY   STATUS      RESTARTS   AGE
exampletest-1-deploy   0/1     Completed   0          14s
exampletest-1-fcz9x    2/2     Running     0          11s

2. Wait for all containers are ready, visit pod terminal we connect to one container by default, switch to another container terminal via container dropdown, container can be switched successfully, no errors

Verified on 4.8.0-0.nightly-2021-05-07-075528
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2021-07-27 23:06:09 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.8.2 bug fix and security update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2438