Bug 1957709
| Summary: | Creation of LoadBalancer service (Openstack Lbaas) take too much to be ready when creating IngressControllers with endpointPublishingStrategy=LoadBalancerService | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Mohamed Tleilia <mtleilia> |
| Component: | Cloud Compute | Assignee: | Michał Dulko <mdulko> |
| Cloud Compute sub component: | OpenStack Provider | QA Contact: | Jon Uriarte <juriarte> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | ||
| Priority: | high | CC: | atn, eduen, emacchi, fgrosjea, gthiemon, hongli, imatza, m.andre, mdulko, mfedosin, pprinett, stephenfin |
| Version: | 4.6.z | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.12.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-01-17 19:46:24 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 12
Joaquín Veira
2021-09-01 08:40:01 UTC
Mohamed, * The issue won't be fixed in the legacy cloud provider * The RFE was indeed created but wasn't prioritized by PM. Please reach out to them if we need to bump its priority. * Since the BZ is marked as High and is linked to 3 cases, we won't close it. However keep in mind that we have no action in progress for this one. Please close when you think it's fine to close. Thanks Removing the Triaged keyword because: * the target release value is missing * the QE automation assessment (flag qe_test_coverage) is missing I'm moving this to ON_QA - it seems like new cloud provider solves this by using bulk Octavia APIs to create LBs. My tests on a tiny 5 node cluster show 32% improvement in LB creation time and I think it'll be even better with higher number of nodes. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.12.0 bug fix and security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:7399 The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days |