Bug 195818

Summary:	wine-docs: broken FC3 -> FC4 upgrade path
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ville Skyttä <scop>
Component:	wine-docs	Assignee:	Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	4	CC:	extras-qa
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-08-22 08:30:21 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	179852
Bug Blocks:

Description Ville Skyttä 2006-06-18 07:41:56 UTC

From https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-June/msg00749.html

wine-docs:
  3: 0:0.9.15-1.fc3 (FE3)
  4: 0:0.9.15-0.1.fc4 (FE4)
  5: 0:0.9.15-1.fc5 (FE5)
  6: 0:0.9.15-1.fc6 (FE6)

This is probably not at all critical since it's a doc package after all, but
should be fixed even if only to keep it off the broken upgrade paths report.

Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2006-06-26 22:00:42 UTC

I see this was updated to 0.9.16, why not fix the upgrade path while at it?  I
don't see why bug 179852 should block such a simple fix.

Comment 2 Andreas Bierfert 2006-06-27 09:07:43 UTC

because ;)
The version number reflects that the FE4 build is just a ugly workaround nothing
more and nothing less and that other stuff needs to be fixed in order to get
this working. So actually I would rather stick with the FE3 version on an
FE3->FE4 upgrade then install the FE4 version (if you take a closer look
FE{3,5,6} specs are identical. So this is ok, at least from my pov. I would
rather want to know what is blocking the fix so we can get this build in a sane
fashion.

Comment 3 Andreas Bierfert 2006-08-22 08:30:21 UTC

K you won ;)