Bug 1958652
Summary: | Default storage is used instead of the storage selected in the Migration Plan wizard | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Migration Toolkit for Virtualization | Reporter: | Igor Braginsky <ibragins> |
Component: | User Experience | Assignee: | Mike Turley <mturley> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Igor Braginsky <ibragins> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Avital Pinnick <apinnick> |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 2.0.0 | CC: | apinnick, fdupont, istein, mguetta |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Regression |
Target Release: | 2.0.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-06-10 17:12:05 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Igor Braginsky
2021-05-09 15:02:48 UTC
What happens if you cancel the plan edit and run it? Will it use the selected storage class or the default one? If it uses the selected one, I don't think it's urgent. I'm asking, because I'm suspecting that the UI reuses the same logic as during the plan creation and pre-selects the default storage class. If that's the case, it's a confusing behavior and should be fixed, but it can wait until 2.1.0. @fdupont you are right, if I just create plan and run it - proper storage type is used for it, problem is relevant only when I'm editing plan. Thanks. Then, I really think that this BZ and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958649 should be fixed together. Investigating further, I think the two BZs are caused by separate issues, but the fixes would conflict so I will fix them together. Ha! Fabien, you were right, these were the same issue. I misunderstood what was happening with prefilling mappings (the code I thought was broken is fine), and after going back to square one I found that both BZs come down to one dumb typo. PR incoming. Should be fixed by https://github.com/konveyor/forklift-ui/pull/591 (backport: https://github.com/konveyor/forklift-ui/pull/592). The fix is in build 2.0.0-13 / iib:74067. Verified this on MTV 2.0.0-13, storage type selected by user during creation is there when editing plan. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (MTV 2.0.0 images), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2021:2381 |