Bug 195992
| Summary: | %{_libexecdir} complains on not architecture dependant binaries | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh> |
| Component: | rpmlint | Assignee: | Ville Skyttä <scop> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | extras-qa, toshio |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-livecd-list/2006-June/msg00051.html | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 0.77-1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-06-20 15:53:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
rpmlint follows the FHS unless the Fedora packaging guidelines add specific exceptions to it. I don't think there is an exception for libexec, and many packages have already been fixed to not use it. I'll ask about libexecdir on the packaging list. I think Ville's right that there isn't a current exception for libexecdir but I've seen a number of reasons for using it on the mailing lists. The last email discussion I recall tailed off when an @redhat person was going to push for libexecdir's inclusion in the FHS without later followup (at least, according to the FHS mailing list archives.) This might be the thread I remember. It definitely has information about the value of libexecdir: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/25433/ Fixed in 0.77-1 (by filtering the warning) per today's packaging committee meeting. |
Description of problem: In kadischi's spec file we added %{_libexecdir}/%{name}/find-live-cd We were able to rpmbuild successfully. But rpmlint complains the usage of %{_libexecdir} where it should accept it without complainng. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rpmlint-0.76-1.fc6 How reproducible: eveytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpmbuild -ba kadischi.spec 2. http://beta.glwb.info/kadischi.spec http://beta.glwb.info/kadischi.tar.bz2 3. rpmlint -i kadischi-2.1-2.20060620cvs.i386.rpm Actual results: W: kadischi non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec Your package is creating a non-standard subdirectory in /usr. The standard directories are: -X11R6 -X386 -bin -games -include -lib -local -sbin -share -src -spool -tmp -lib64 Expected results: No warnings. Additional info: From Toshio on Fedora Livecd Mailing List: Fedora and the BSDs makes use of libexecdir. FHS and most other linux distributions do not. If you look at how gnome panel applets are placed, you'll see that upstream installs them to libexecdir. Fedora follows this. Debian sets libexecdir to /usr/lib and installs the applets there. It's safe to install to libexecdir on Fedora.