Bug 196171

Summary: Autofs debuginfo package does not include debug symbols for autofs-4.1.3-184.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Reporter: Barry Donahue <bdonahue>
Component: autofsAssignee: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 3.0CC: coughlan, ikent, tkincaid
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2006-0459 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-07-20 14:44:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 181408    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Add the DONTSTRIP build option so we generate proper debuginfo none

Description Barry Donahue 2006-06-21 17:56:40 UTC 
Description of problem:
  Autofs debuginfo does not contain the symbols.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
  autofs-4.1.3-184.

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install autofs-4.1.3-184.
2. find this pid of a running automounter.
3.gdb /usr/sbin/automounter
4.<gdb> attach <pid>
5.<gdb> bt
  
Actual results:
  You will only see hex addresses in the back trace.



Expected results:
  You should see that names of the functions in the trace.


Additional info:
Comment 1 Jeff Moyer 2006-06-21 18:36:37 UTC 
Created attachment 131309 [details]
Add the DONTSTRIP build option so we generate proper debuginfo
Comment 2 Jeff Moyer 2006-06-21 18:37:49 UTC 
A fix was built into 4.1.3-186.
Comment 3 Jeff Moyer 2006-06-21 19:29:32 UTC 
This fix is very low risk, it simply enables a compile-time option to prevent
stripping of automount binaries.  Without the patch, the debuginfo RPM is useless.
Comment 7 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-07-20 14:44:36 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0459.html