Bug 196262
Summary: | Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | gauret, rdieter |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-21 07:26:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Chitlesh GOORAH
2006-06-22 09:25:43 UTC
404 not found... Sorry, URL fixed though I have a problem with included -devel inside my spec file. from http://beta.glwb.info/katapult/katapult.spec Im having rpmlint -i katapult-0.3.1.3-1.i386.rpm W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapult.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapultdisplay.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapultcatalog.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. So I modified as required http://beta.glwb.info/katapult/katapult_.spec during installation, I fell on root(i386)[0]$rpm -ivh katapult-* error: Failed dependencies: katapult-devel-0.3.1.3 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-1.i386 libkatapult.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-1.i386 libkatapultcatalog.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-1.i386 libkatapultdisplay.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-1.i386 the katapult package needs %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so %{_libdir}/lib%{name}catalog.so %{_libdir}/lib%{name}display.so to install but rpmlint wants me to put them in -devel package how can I ask katapult to pull katapult-devel as dependency ? Looks like you may have some version of katapult already installed? The specfile refers to shared libs lib*.so.1 but the dependancies speak of lib*.so.0 Something here is not right. Other suggestions, 1. drop Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils not needed/used. 2. don't package libtool archives either do in %install rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/lib*.la or %exclude them Updated: Spec URL: http://beta.glwb.info/katapult/katapult.spec SRPM URL: http://beta.glwb.info/katapult/katapult-0.3.1.3-4.src.rpm Looks pretty good, I'll give it a once over... Checks out OK, and for the record: $rpmlint katapult-0.3.1.3-4.fc6.i386.rpm W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapult.so W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapultdisplay.so W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapultcatalog.so (harmless, no biggie). APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once the package has been imported into Extras' cvs. Why haven't you imported this package to Extras? I think Chitlesh has been on vacation: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Vacation Sorry, yes I was on vacation :) |