Bug 196266
| Summary: | kdevelop: missing qt4 template | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Frank Büttner <bugzilla> |
| Component: | kdevelop | Assignee: | Than Ngo <than> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5 | CC: | extras-qa, rdieter, triage |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | bzcl34nup | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-05-06 16:01:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Frank Büttner
2006-06-22 10:22:19 UTC
Is such a thing included in the qt4 tarball? If so, where? no.But can try to buit it when using the Qt3 tempplate. PS: Qt 4.1.4 has released. So please update:) I'm currently leaning toward not doing this, since it's not included upstream. That is, unless it's trivially simple to implement what you want (and that's not clear to me). What exactly do you suggest adding? From where? to where? When use kdevelop ther are only templates for Qt3. I will try to build one and post it here. So I have find that this is an problem of the kdevelop package. On the KDE page it is written, that kdevelop 3.3.3. have templates for Qt4. kdevelop 3.3. is included at FC5. But how can this be solved?? > But how can this be solved??
Apparently not here, anyway. Maybe in kdevelop? Reassigning there.
Reassigned to fc5/kdevelop Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers This bug is open for a Fedora version that is no longer maintained and will not be fixed by Fedora. Therefore we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen thus bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |