Bug 1963901
Summary: | RHEL9 - ppc64le: glibc fails to check IS_ERR_VALUE when using scv | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy> |
Component: | glibc | Assignee: | glibc team <glibc-bugzilla> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Sergey Kolosov <skolosov> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 9.0 | CC: | ashankar, bugproxy, codonell, dj, fweimer, mnewsome, pfrankli, sipoyare |
Target Milestone: | beta | Keywords: | Bugfix, Patch, Triaged |
Target Release: | 9.0 Beta | ||
Hardware: | ppc64le | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glibc-2.33-14.el9 | Doc Type: | No Doc Update |
Doc Text: |
If this bug requires documentation, please select an appropriate Doc Type value.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-12-07 21:42:00 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1962971 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1875375 |
Description
IBM Bug Proxy
2021-05-24 11:10:27 UTC
== Comment: #0 - Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tulioqm.com> - 2021-05-21 16:11:35 == ---Problem Description--- glibc fails to check IS_ERR_VALUE when using scv. This bug has been reported upstream as: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27892 It has also been reported for Fedora 35: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962971 Contact Information = Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho/tulioqm.com ---Additional Hardware Info--- A POWER9 or POWER10 server with support for scv is required to reproduce the error. ---Steps to Reproduce--- 1. Build strace and its tests. 2. Run test tests/signal Userspace rpm: glibc The userspace tool has the following bit modes: 64-bit ------- Comment From tulioqm.com 2021-05-24 10:12 EDT-------
> May we make this bug report public? Thanks.
Yes, but I don't know how to do this.
Could you help me, please?
|