Bug 1966180

Summary: Cephadm needs to support RHEL 9
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Sebastian Wagner <sewagner>
Component: CephadmAssignee: Adam King <adking>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Manasa <mgowri>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Akash Raj <akraj>
Priority: high    
Version: 5.1CC: adking, akraj, jcaratza, kdreyer, mgowri, vereddy
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 5.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: cephadm-16.2.8-45.el9cp Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Bootstrap {storage-product} cluster is supported on {os-product} 9 With this release, `Cephadm` bootstrap is available on {os-product} 9 hosts to enable {storage-product} 5.2 support for {os-product} 9. Users can now bootstrap a Ceph cluster on {os-product} 9 hosts.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-08-09 17:35:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1820257, 2102272    

Description Sebastian Wagner 2021-05-31 15:47:16 UTC
This is the BZ RFE for tracking RHCEPH-350

Comment 1 Yaniv Kaul 2021-06-01 06:52:55 UTC
(In reply to Sebastian Wagner from comment #0)

<snip>
> 
> (I just don't want to look into Trello everytime to see this issue)

It should be in JIRA. In fact, once we are in JIRA, I expect this Bugzilla to automatically sync into JIRA.
So in 5.1, either this item is in JIRA, or you create a Bugzilla and it'll sync into JIRA - in either case, your primary tool is JIRA.

(note that regardless, the flow I would expect is this to be an issue upstream, and downstream will just inherit the feature when rebasing, which I assume we'll do for 5.1 or 5.2.

Comment 2 Sebastian Wagner 2021-06-01 07:54:17 UTC
(In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #1)
> (In reply to Sebastian Wagner from comment #0)
> 
> <snip>
> > 
> > (I just don't want to look into Trello everytime to see this issue)
> 
> It should be in JIRA. In fact, once we are in JIRA, I expect this Bugzilla
> to automatically sync into JIRA.

I've already seen lots of automated sync-ups with Jira already. I wonder why this hasn't been synced up already. Anyway.


> So in 5.1, either this item is in JIRA, or you create a Bugzilla and it'll
> sync into JIRA - in either case, your primary tool is JIRA.

+1 


> (note that regardless, the flow I would expect is this to be an issue
> upstream, and downstream will just inherit the feature when rebasing, which
> I assume we'll do for 5.1 or 5.2.

+1 David is already working on adding CentOS Stream 9 to upstream.

Comment 3 Sebastian Wagner 2021-07-07 14:59:39 UTC
This issue is BLOCKED by Ceph upstream not supporting CentOS 9 Stream.

Comment 20 errata-xmlrpc 2022-08-09 17:35:53 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage Security, Bug Fix, and Enhancement Update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:5997