Bug 1966180
Summary: | Cephadm needs to support RHEL 9 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Sebastian Wagner <sewagner> |
Component: | Cephadm | Assignee: | Adam King <adking> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Manasa <mgowri> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Akash Raj <akraj> |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 5.1 | CC: | adking, akraj, jcaratza, kdreyer, mgowri, vereddy |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | 5.2 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | cephadm-16.2.8-45.el9cp | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: |
.Bootstrap {storage-product} cluster is supported on {os-product} 9
With this release, `Cephadm` bootstrap is available on {os-product} 9 hosts to enable {storage-product} 5.2 support for {os-product} 9. Users can now bootstrap a Ceph cluster on {os-product} 9 hosts.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-08-09 17:35:53 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1820257, 2102272 |
Description
Sebastian Wagner
2021-05-31 15:47:16 UTC
(In reply to Sebastian Wagner from comment #0) <snip> > > (I just don't want to look into Trello everytime to see this issue) It should be in JIRA. In fact, once we are in JIRA, I expect this Bugzilla to automatically sync into JIRA. So in 5.1, either this item is in JIRA, or you create a Bugzilla and it'll sync into JIRA - in either case, your primary tool is JIRA. (note that regardless, the flow I would expect is this to be an issue upstream, and downstream will just inherit the feature when rebasing, which I assume we'll do for 5.1 or 5.2. (In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #1) > (In reply to Sebastian Wagner from comment #0) > > <snip> > > > > (I just don't want to look into Trello everytime to see this issue) > > It should be in JIRA. In fact, once we are in JIRA, I expect this Bugzilla > to automatically sync into JIRA. I've already seen lots of automated sync-ups with Jira already. I wonder why this hasn't been synced up already. Anyway. > So in 5.1, either this item is in JIRA, or you create a Bugzilla and it'll > sync into JIRA - in either case, your primary tool is JIRA. +1 > (note that regardless, the flow I would expect is this to be an issue > upstream, and downstream will just inherit the feature when rebasing, which > I assume we'll do for 5.1 or 5.2. +1 David is already working on adding CentOS Stream 9 to upstream. This issue is BLOCKED by Ceph upstream not supporting CentOS 9 Stream. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage Security, Bug Fix, and Enhancement Update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:5997 |