Bug 1966342
| Summary: | maven update errors when updating alternatives | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michal Jaegermann <michal.jnn> |
| Component: | maven | Assignee: | Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk> |
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | java-maint-sig, java-sig-commits, mizdebsk, msrb, sochotni |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-06-05 08:37:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Michal Jaegermann
2021-05-31 21:34:44 UTC
I don't see the issue from spec file examination. The problem is not reproducible during F34 -> F35 upgrade. I tried rawhide upgrade from Fedora-Rawhide-20210520.n.1 to Fedora-Rawhide-20210529.n.0, but the issue is not reproducible either. Michal, can you specify which version-release of maven package where upgrading from? That is the version-release you hand installed before starting the upgrade. Without that information I'm unable to reproduce the issue. (In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #1) > I don't see the issue from spec file examination. > The problem is not reproducible during F34 -> F35 upgrade. Quite likely. As I wrote this is probably a leftover from many versions back and I simply never paid attention before. The files in question in /usr/share/man/man1/ have timestamps from 2018. I bumped into this while searching for another possible issue. It seems to me that one never knows from which version an upgrade runs and what was really on a disk. Besides it is enough just to add suitable 'rm -f ...' in a package script just before 'update-alternatives ...'. OTOH if you just want to ignore that then this is your call. Since the problem is not reproducible I'll have to close it without a fix. Feel free to reopen it if there is a way to reproduce it. |