Bug 196673
Summary: | kernel-devel package missing from Bugzilla | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] Bugzilla | Reporter: | Daniel Qarras <dqarras> |
Component: | Bugzilla General | Assignee: | PnT DevOps Devs <hss-ied-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 2.18 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-10-28 16:43:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Daniel Qarras
2006-06-26 12:44:05 UTC
So, what's the status with this? Any news on this one? I guess we can use kernel instead of kernel-devel, then. Hi Daniel ,, Can you please tell us the name of the component, product, the initialowner and the initialqacontact and the component description and we will add it for you. Thanks, Noura Hi Noura, actually I think it's in fact better not to add this after all: the same people build both kernel and kernel-devel packages, they'll know how to fix possible bugs even if reported against kernel. It would just add unnecessary overhead so I guess it's best for all to leave things as-is. Thanks! |