Bug 1967596

Summary:	Temporary password rules are not enforce with local password policy
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	thierry bordaz <tbordaz>
Component:	389-ds-base	Assignee:	thierry bordaz <tbordaz>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	RHDS QE <ds-qe-bugs>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.5	CC:	gkimetto, ldap-maint, mreynolds, sgouvern, vashirov
Target Milestone:	beta	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	sync-to-jira
Fixed In Version:	389-ds-1.4-8050020210629182703.1a75f91c	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-11-09 18:11:20 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description thierry bordaz 2021-06-03 12:58:22 UTC

Description of problem:
Clone of #4789
A local password policy may contain temporary password rules. However they are not taken into account and fallback to global ones.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
in 8.5ITM14

How reproducible:
Create a local password policy with TPR and a global password policy with others TPR values. Then check that TPR of local password policy are not taken into account


Actual results:
TPR in Local password policy are not taken into account

Expected results:
Local password policy should support TPR


Additional info:

Comment 1 thierry bordaz 2021-06-15 14:24:06 UTC

Fix pushed upstream => POST

Comment 9 sgouvern 2021-07-12 07:55:20 UTC

As per comment 6, marking as VERIFIED

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2021-11-09 18:11:20 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (389-ds-base bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:4203