Bug 1969306
| Summary: | [failover vf][RHEL85_vm] the failover vf and failover virtio nic with the same MAC address have different valid IP addresses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | Yanghang Liu <yanghliu> | ||||||
| Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | NetworkManager Development Team <nm-team> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||
| Version: | 9.0 | CC: | aadam, bgalvani, chayang, ferferna, jinzhao, juzhang, lrintel, lvivier, rkhan, sfaye, sukulkar, till, virt-maint, wquan, yalzhang, yama | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2022-11-24 11:54:06 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Yanghang Liu
2021-06-08 07:36:37 UTC
Created attachment 1789336 [details]
the current-configuration of the private swicth which PF is connected to
Yanghang, Could you provide the logs of the VM kernel? Could you check the DHCP server on the bridge network is the same server as on the PF network? Could you provide logs of the DHCP server to see why it doesn't provide the same IP address for the same MAC address? Thanks Created attachment 1791499 [details]
vm kernel dmesg log
(In reply to Laurent Vivier from comment #2) > Yanghang, Hi Laurent, > Could you provide the logs of the VM kernel? The vm dmesg is in the attachment. > Could you check the DHCP server on the bridge network is the same server as on the PF network? As the following information indicates, the failover vf network and the bridge network are both created based on the same PF(enp6s0f1). # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.3cfdfe1590aa no enp6s0f1 # virsh net-dumpxml failover-bridge <network> <name>failover-bridge</name> <uuid>ddc85097-aad6-4f2c-b2d7-83f5bc88c884</uuid> <forward mode='bridge'/> <bridge name='br0'/> </network> # virsh net-dumpxml failover-vf --inactive <network> <name>failover-vf</name> <uuid>46e42769-1513-4967-8889-c6f5216ba212</uuid> <forward mode='hostdev' managed='yes'> <pf dev='enp6s0f1'/> </forward> </network> The PF(enp6s0f1) is connected to a private switch that configured with DHCP service. > Could you provide logs of the DHCP server to see why it doesn't provide the same IP address for the same MAC address? I configured the DHCP service on a private switch(the detailed configuration of this switch is in the attachment) If possible , could you please tell me which log "DHCP server log" refers to ? According to the infor I got from the switch's arp table, *the failover virtio net devcie* and *the failover vf* with the same MAC address are indeed assigned different IP addresses: (The reason for the difference between the IP address here and the one in the bug description is because I restarted the vm , but the same problem can still be reproduced.) <H3C>display arp Type: S-Static D-Dynamic O-Openflow R-Rule M-Multiport I-Invalid IP address MAC address VLAN Interface Aging Type 192.168.200.10 3cfd-fe15-90aa 200 FGE1/0/42 5 D <-- the br0 on the host 192.168.200.115 5254-11aa-1cef 200 FGE1/0/42 20 D <-- the failvoer virtio net devcie in the vm 192.168.200.197 5254-11aa-1cef 200 FGE1/0/42 20 D <-- the failover vf in the vm (In reply to Yanghang Liu from comment #4) .... > If possible , could you please tell me which log "DHCP server log" refers to > ? What I try to understand is: 1- why enp5s0 is asking for an IP address? in the VM: Could you check if /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0 exists? (it should not)? There should not be any connection configured to enp5s0 and "nmcli con show enp5s0" should fail Could you check the log of NetworkManager? (something like "journalctl -b 0 -t NetworkManager -o short", you can add "| grep dhcp" at the end to check only DHCP) 2- why the IP address provided is not the same one? Normally the same MAC address implies the same IP address, so I guess there is two DHCP servers, one local on the host bound to the bridge br0 and one bound to the physical network. Could you check if dnsmasq is running on the host and if it is providing the IP address? journalctl -b 0 -t dnsmasq-dhcp -o short|grep 52:54:11:aa:1c:ef Ideally you should also check the logs of your private switch bound to PF(enp6s0f1) to see if it provides the IP address too. To fix "1-", you can do "nmcli con del enp5s0" To Fix "2", you must find the dnsmasq.conf file that is used (by default "/etc/dnsmasq.conf", but check "ps -ef|grep dnsmasq" to see if there is a "--conf-file" parameter). In the configuration file, check "interface=" is NOT "br0" (the name of you bridge in comment #0) Thanks Update the "Steps to Reproduce": (1) create bridge named br0 based on the PF (2) setup vm network (3) start a vm with only with a failover virtio net device (4) hot-plug a failover vf into the vm (In reply to Laurent Vivier from comment #6) Hi Laurent, Thanks for the info. > What I try to understand is: > > 1- why enp5s0 is asking for an IP address? > > in the VM: > > Could you check if /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0 exists? (it should not)? > There should not be any connection configured to enp5s0 and "nmcli con show enp5s0" should fail > Could you check the log of NetworkManager? > (something like "journalctl -b 0 -t NetworkManager -o short", you can add "| grep dhcp" at the end to check only DHCP) > To fix "1-", you can do "nmcli con del enp5s0" For 1 , I can prevent the "failover vf"(enp5s0) from getting an IP address by deleting the related connection. And I will do some detailed tests to see if this behavior is working properly in other failover vf migration test scenarios. > 2- why the IP address provided is not the same one? For 2, I have not found the root cause of this problem yet. > Normally the same MAC address implies the same IP address, so I guess there is two DHCP servers, one local on the host bound to the bridge br0 and one bound to the physical network. > > Could you check if dnsmasq is running on the host and if it is providing the IP address? > journalctl -b 0 -t dnsmasq-dhcp -o short|grep 52:54:11:aa:1c:ef The dnsmasq on the host is not provided any IP address for 52:54:11:aa:1c:ef. The related command info output is as following: # journalctl -b 0 -t dnsmasq-dhcp -o short|grep 52:54:11:aa:1c:ef <--- There is no output after running this command > Ideally you should also check the logs of your private switch bound to PF(enp6s0f1) to see if it provides the IP address too. As I mentioned in comment 5, I can see that the same MAC address has two different IP addresses on the arp table of the private switch > To Fix "2", you must find the dnsmasq.conf file that is used (by default "/etc/dnsmasq.conf", but check "ps -ef|grep dnsmasq" to see if there is a "--conf-file" parameter). > In the configuration file, check "interface=" is NOT "br0" (the name of you bridge in comment #0) The related command info output is as following: # ps -ef|grep dnsmasq dnsmasq 2401 1 0 18:35 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/dnsmasq --conf-file=/var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.conf --leasefile-ro --dhcp-script=/usr/libexec/libvirt_leaseshelper root 2402 2401 0 18:35 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/dnsmasq --conf-file=/var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.conf --leasefile-ro --dhcp-script=/usr/libexec/libvirt_leaseshelper # cat /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.conf | grep -i interface except-interface=lo interface=virbr0 <---- the interface is "virtbr0" instead of "br0" The issue can be easily reproduced by live migration between rhel8.4.0 and rhel8.5.0, almost 100% reproduce ratio. For steps and package version, pls refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999927#c0, just change win10 guest to rhel8.4.0 guest. # ifconfig enp1s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 10.73.74.5 netmask 255.255.252.0 broadcast 10.73.75.255 inet6 2620:52:0:4948:f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> inet6 fe80::f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether f4:8e:38:c3:80:80 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 7582 bytes 548637 (535.7 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 169 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 151 bytes 15631 (15.2 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 enp4s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.200.222 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.200.255 inet6 fe80::e9e9:9c38:3fb5:bd29 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> inet6 2001::6398:cd12:a87c:754c prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 126 bytes 15440 (15.0 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 44 bytes 7372 (7.1 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 enp4s0nsby: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 198 bytes 23023 (22.4 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 52 bytes 9280 (9.0 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 enp5s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.200.223 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.200.255 inet6 fe80::9c3c:b999:e0b6:65f3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 8 bytes 1640 (1.6 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 4 bytes 1112 (1.0 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 Move RHEL-AV bugs to RHEL9. If necessary to resolve in RHEL8, then clone to the current RHEL8 release. Removed the ITR from all bugs as part of the change. (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #9) > The issue can be easily reproduced by live migration between rhel8.4.0 and > rhel8.5.0, almost 100% reproduce ratio. > > For steps and package version, pls refer to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999927#c0, just change win10 > guest to rhel8.4.0 guest. > > # ifconfig > enp1s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 10.73.74.5 netmask 255.255.252.0 broadcast 10.73.75.255 > inet6 2620:52:0:4948:f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid > 0x0<global> > inet6 fe80::f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > ether f4:8e:38:c3:80:80 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 7582 bytes 548637 (535.7 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 169 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 151 bytes 15631 (15.2 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > enp4s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.200.222 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > 192.168.200.255 > inet6 fe80::e9e9:9c38:3fb5:bd29 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > inet6 2001::6398:cd12:a87c:754c prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 126 bytes 15440 (15.0 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 44 bytes 7372 (7.1 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > enp4s0nsby: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 198 bytes 23023 (22.4 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 52 bytes 9280 (9.0 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > enp5s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.200.223 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > 192.168.200.255 > inet6 fe80::9c3c:b999:e0b6:65f3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 8 bytes 1640 (1.6 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 4 bytes 1112 (1.0 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 Could you check you DON'T have the file /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0 ? Thanks (In reply to Laurent Vivier from comment #11) > (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #9) > > The issue can be easily reproduced by live migration between rhel8.4.0 and > > rhel8.5.0, almost 100% reproduce ratio. > > > > For steps and package version, pls refer to > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999927#c0, just change win10 > > guest to rhel8.4.0 guest. > > > > # ifconfig > > enp1s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > inet 10.73.74.5 netmask 255.255.252.0 broadcast 10.73.75.255 > > inet6 2620:52:0:4948:f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid > > 0x0<global> > > inet6 fe80::f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > ether f4:8e:38:c3:80:80 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > RX packets 7582 bytes 548637 (535.7 KiB) > > RX errors 0 dropped 169 overruns 0 frame 0 > > TX packets 151 bytes 15631 (15.2 KiB) > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > enp4s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > inet 192.168.200.222 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > > 192.168.200.255 > > inet6 fe80::e9e9:9c38:3fb5:bd29 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > inet6 2001::6398:cd12:a87c:754c prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > RX packets 126 bytes 15440 (15.0 KiB) > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > TX packets 44 bytes 7372 (7.1 KiB) > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > enp4s0nsby: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > RX packets 198 bytes 23023 (22.4 KiB) > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > TX packets 52 bytes 9280 (9.0 KiB) > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > enp5s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > inet 192.168.200.223 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > > 192.168.200.255 > > inet6 fe80::9c3c:b999:e0b6:65f3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > RX packets 8 bytes 1640 (1.6 KiB) > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > TX packets 4 bytes 1112 (1.0 KiB) > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > Could you check you DON'T have the file > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0 ? > Yes, only ifcfg-enp1s0 file exists. # cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ # ls ifcfg-enp1s0 # cat ifcfg-enp1s0 TYPE=Ethernet PROXY_METHOD=none BROWSER_ONLY=no BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no NAME=enp1s0 UUID=d7c9441b-de89-4b4f-84c1-69b88ff06c38 DEVICE=enp1s0 ONBOOT=yes > Thanks (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #12) > (In reply to Laurent Vivier from comment #11) > > (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #9) > > > The issue can be easily reproduced by live migration between rhel8.4.0 and > > > rhel8.5.0, almost 100% reproduce ratio. > > > > > > For steps and package version, pls refer to > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999927#c0, just change win10 > > > guest to rhel8.4.0 guest. > > > > > > # ifconfig > > > enp1s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > inet 10.73.74.5 netmask 255.255.252.0 broadcast 10.73.75.255 > > > inet6 2620:52:0:4948:f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid > > > 0x0<global> > > > inet6 fe80::f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > > ether f4:8e:38:c3:80:80 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > RX packets 7582 bytes 548637 (535.7 KiB) > > > RX errors 0 dropped 169 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > TX packets 151 bytes 15631 (15.2 KiB) > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > enp4s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > inet 192.168.200.222 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > > > 192.168.200.255 > > > inet6 fe80::e9e9:9c38:3fb5:bd29 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > > inet6 2001::6398:cd12:a87c:754c prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> > > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > RX packets 126 bytes 15440 (15.0 KiB) > > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > TX packets 44 bytes 7372 (7.1 KiB) > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > enp4s0nsby: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > RX packets 198 bytes 23023 (22.4 KiB) > > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > TX packets 52 bytes 9280 (9.0 KiB) > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > enp5s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > inet 192.168.200.223 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > > > 192.168.200.255 > > > inet6 fe80::9c3c:b999:e0b6:65f3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > RX packets 8 bytes 1640 (1.6 KiB) > > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > TX packets 4 bytes 1112 (1.0 KiB) > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > Could you check you DON'T have the file > > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0 ? > > > > Yes, only ifcfg-enp1s0 file exists. > > > # cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ > # ls > ifcfg-enp1s0 > # cat ifcfg-enp1s0 > TYPE=Ethernet > PROXY_METHOD=none > BROWSER_ONLY=no > BOOTPROTO=dhcp > DEFROUTE=yes > IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no > IPV6INIT=yes > IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes > IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes > IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no > NAME=enp1s0 > UUID=d7c9441b-de89-4b4f-84c1-69b88ff06c38 > DEVICE=enp1s0 > ONBOOT=yes > > Thanks This is really weird. Who configure enp4s0 and enp5s0 then? Do you have results for "nmcli con show enp4s0 enp5s0"? (In reply to Laurent Vivier from comment #13) > (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #12) > > (In reply to Laurent Vivier from comment #11) > > > (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #9) > > > > The issue can be easily reproduced by live migration between rhel8.4.0 and > > > > rhel8.5.0, almost 100% reproduce ratio. > > > > > > > > For steps and package version, pls refer to > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999927#c0, just change win10 > > > > guest to rhel8.4.0 guest. > > > > > > > > # ifconfig > > > > enp1s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > > inet 10.73.74.5 netmask 255.255.252.0 broadcast 10.73.75.255 > > > > inet6 2620:52:0:4948:f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid > > > > 0x0<global> > > > > inet6 fe80::f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > > > ether f4:8e:38:c3:80:80 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > > RX packets 7582 bytes 548637 (535.7 KiB) > > > > RX errors 0 dropped 169 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > > TX packets 151 bytes 15631 (15.2 KiB) > > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > > > enp4s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > > inet 192.168.200.222 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > > > > 192.168.200.255 > > > > inet6 fe80::e9e9:9c38:3fb5:bd29 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > > > inet6 2001::6398:cd12:a87c:754c prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> > > > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > > RX packets 126 bytes 15440 (15.0 KiB) > > > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > > TX packets 44 bytes 7372 (7.1 KiB) > > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > > > enp4s0nsby: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > > RX packets 198 bytes 23023 (22.4 KiB) > > > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > > TX packets 52 bytes 9280 (9.0 KiB) > > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > > > enp5s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > > inet 192.168.200.223 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > > > > 192.168.200.255 > > > > inet6 fe80::9c3c:b999:e0b6:65f3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > > RX packets 8 bytes 1640 (1.6 KiB) > > > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > > TX packets 4 bytes 1112 (1.0 KiB) > > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > Could you check you DON'T have the file > > > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0 ? > > > > > > > Yes, only ifcfg-enp1s0 file exists. > > > > > > # cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ > > # ls > > ifcfg-enp1s0 > > # cat ifcfg-enp1s0 > > TYPE=Ethernet > > PROXY_METHOD=none > > BROWSER_ONLY=no > > BOOTPROTO=dhcp > > DEFROUTE=yes > > IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no > > IPV6INIT=yes > > IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes > > IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes > > IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no > > NAME=enp1s0 > > UUID=d7c9441b-de89-4b4f-84c1-69b88ff06c38 > > DEVICE=enp1s0 > > ONBOOT=yes > > > Thanks > > > This is really weird. Who configure enp4s0 and enp5s0 then? > Hi Laurent, Please note the additional info in comment 0, my environment is the same with that. (3) The PF is connected to a private switch that I have configured with DHCP and VLAN services. The switch configure details is in the attachment. > Do you have results for "nmcli con show enp4s0 enp5s0"? # nmcli c show NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE Wired connection 2 52fbcc8b-0f0f-3553-a693-aa3ab0052240 ethernet enp4s0nsby enp1s0 d7c9441b-de89-4b4f-84c1-69b88ff06c38 ethernet enp1s0 Wired connection 1 b8269223-09ba-3433-b75f-638e3f87d4c7 ethernet enp4s0 Wired connection 3 f4b3782e-a253-3d50-828f-9936798f6f41 ethernet enp5s0 # nmcli c show "Wired connection 1" connection.id: Wired connection 1 connection.uuid: b8269223-09ba-3433-b75f-638e3f87d4c7 connection.stable-id: -- connection.type: 802-3-ethernet connection.interface-name: enp4s0 connection.autoconnect: yes connection.autoconnect-priority: -999 connection.autoconnect-retries: -1 (default) connection.multi-connect: 0 (default) connection.auth-retries: -1 connection.timestamp: 1632300281 connection.read-only: no connection.permissions: -- connection.zone: -- connection.master: -- connection.slave-type: -- connection.autoconnect-slaves: -1 (default) connection.secondaries: -- connection.gateway-ping-timeout: 0 connection.metered: unknown connection.lldp: default connection.mdns: -1 (default) connection.llmnr: -1 (default) connection.wait-device-timeout: -1 802-3-ethernet.port: -- 802-3-ethernet.speed: 0 802-3-ethernet.duplex: -- 802-3-ethernet.auto-negotiate: no 802-3-ethernet.mac-address: -- 802-3-ethernet.cloned-mac-address: -- 802-3-ethernet.generate-mac-address-mask:-- 802-3-ethernet.mac-address-blacklist: -- 802-3-ethernet.mtu: auto 802-3-ethernet.s390-subchannels: -- 802-3-ethernet.s390-nettype: -- 802-3-ethernet.s390-options: -- 802-3-ethernet.wake-on-lan: default 802-3-ethernet.wake-on-lan-password: -- 802-3-ethernet.accept-all-mac-addresses:-1 (default) ipv4.method: auto ipv4.dns: -- ipv4.dns-search: -- ipv4.dns-options: -- ipv4.dns-priority: 0 ipv4.addresses: -- ipv4.gateway: -- ipv4.routes: -- ipv4.route-metric: -1 ipv4.route-table: 0 (unspec) ipv4.routing-rules: -- ipv4.ignore-auto-routes: no ipv4.ignore-auto-dns: no ipv4.dhcp-client-id: -- ipv4.dhcp-iaid: -- ipv4.dhcp-timeout: 0 (default) ipv4.dhcp-send-hostname: yes ipv4.dhcp-hostname: -- ipv4.dhcp-fqdn: -- ipv4.dhcp-hostname-flags: 0x0 (none) ipv4.never-default: no ipv4.may-fail: yes ipv4.dad-timeout: -1 (default) ipv4.dhcp-vendor-class-identifier: -- ipv4.dhcp-reject-servers: -- ipv6.method: auto ipv6.dns: -- ipv6.dns-search: -- ipv6.dns-options: -- ipv6.dns-priority: 0 ipv6.addresses: -- ipv6.gateway: -- ipv6.routes: -- ipv6.route-metric: -1 ipv6.route-table: 0 (unspec) ipv6.routing-rules: -- ipv6.ignore-auto-routes: no ipv6.ignore-auto-dns: no ipv6.never-default: no ipv6.may-fail: yes ipv6.ip6-privacy: -1 (unknown) ipv6.addr-gen-mode: stable-privacy ipv6.ra-timeout: 0 (default) ipv6.dhcp-duid: -- ipv6.dhcp-iaid: -- ipv6.dhcp-timeout: 0 (default) ipv6.dhcp-send-hostname: yes ipv6.dhcp-hostname: -- ipv6.dhcp-hostname-flags: 0x0 (none) ipv6.token: -- proxy.method: none proxy.browser-only: no proxy.pac-url: -- proxy.pac-script: -- GENERAL.NAME: Wired connection 1 GENERAL.UUID: b8269223-09ba-3433-b75f-638e3f87d4c7 GENERAL.DEVICES: enp4s0 GENERAL.IP-IFACE: enp4s0 GENERAL.STATE: activated GENERAL.DEFAULT: no GENERAL.DEFAULT6: no GENERAL.SPEC-OBJECT: -- GENERAL.VPN: no GENERAL.DBUS-PATH: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/2 GENERAL.CON-PATH: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Settings/2 GENERAL.ZONE: -- GENERAL.MASTER-PATH: -- IP4.ADDRESS[1]: 192.168.200.97/24 IP4.GATEWAY: 192.168.200.254 IP4.ROUTE[1]: dst = 0.0.0.0/0, nh = 192.168.200.254, mt = 101 IP4.ROUTE[2]: dst = 192.168.200.0/24, nh = 0.0.0.0, mt = 101 IP4.DNS[1]: 192.168.200.253 DHCP4.OPTION[1]: dhcp_lease_time = 86400 DHCP4.OPTION[2]: dhcp_server_identifier = 192.168.200.254 DHCP4.OPTION[3]: domain_name_servers = 192.168.200.253 DHCP4.OPTION[4]: expiry = 1632385782 DHCP4.OPTION[5]: ip_address = 192.168.200.97 DHCP4.OPTION[6]: requested_broadcast_address = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[7]: requested_domain_name = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[8]: requested_domain_name_servers = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[9]: requested_domain_search = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[10]: requested_host_name = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[11]: requested_interface_mtu = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[12]: requested_ms_classless_static_routes = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[13]: requested_nis_domain = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[14]: requested_nis_servers = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[15]: requested_ntp_servers = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[16]: requested_rfc3442_classless_static_routes = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[17]: requested_root_path = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[18]: requested_routers = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[19]: requested_static_routes = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[20]: requested_subnet_mask = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[21]: requested_time_offset = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[22]: requested_wpad = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[23]: routers = 192.168.200.254 DHCP4.OPTION[24]: subnet_mask = 255.255.255.0 IP6.ADDRESS[1]: 2001::9c00:23d2:ae03:2efb/64 IP6.ADDRESS[2]: fe80::ef5f:2277:95dd:73ad/64 IP6.GATEWAY: fe80::b2f9:63ff:feb8:6d37 IP6.ROUTE[1]: dst = 2001::/64, nh = ::, mt = 101 IP6.ROUTE[2]: dst = ::/0, nh = fe80::b2f9:63ff:feb8:6d37, mt = 101 IP6.ROUTE[3]: dst = fe80::/64, nh = ::, mt = 101 # nmcli c show "Wired connection 3" connection.id: Wired connection 3 connection.uuid: f4b3782e-a253-3d50-828f-9936798f6f41 connection.stable-id: -- connection.type: 802-3-ethernet connection.interface-name: enp5s0 connection.autoconnect: yes connection.autoconnect-priority: -999 connection.autoconnect-retries: -1 (default) connection.multi-connect: 0 (default) connection.auth-retries: -1 connection.timestamp: 1632300281 connection.read-only: no connection.permissions: -- connection.zone: -- connection.master: -- connection.slave-type: -- connection.autoconnect-slaves: -1 (default) connection.secondaries: -- connection.gateway-ping-timeout: 0 connection.metered: unknown connection.lldp: default connection.mdns: -1 (default) connection.llmnr: -1 (default) connection.wait-device-timeout: -1 802-3-ethernet.port: -- 802-3-ethernet.speed: 0 802-3-ethernet.duplex: -- 802-3-ethernet.auto-negotiate: no 802-3-ethernet.mac-address: -- 802-3-ethernet.cloned-mac-address: -- 802-3-ethernet.generate-mac-address-mask:-- 802-3-ethernet.mac-address-blacklist: -- 802-3-ethernet.mtu: auto 802-3-ethernet.s390-subchannels: -- 802-3-ethernet.s390-nettype: -- 802-3-ethernet.s390-options: -- 802-3-ethernet.wake-on-lan: default 802-3-ethernet.wake-on-lan-password: -- 802-3-ethernet.accept-all-mac-addresses:-1 (default) ipv4.method: auto ipv4.dns: -- ipv4.dns-search: -- ipv4.dns-options: -- ipv4.dns-priority: 0 ipv4.addresses: -- ipv4.gateway: -- ipv4.routes: -- ipv4.route-metric: -1 ipv4.route-table: 0 (unspec) ipv4.routing-rules: -- ipv4.ignore-auto-routes: no ipv4.ignore-auto-dns: no ipv4.dhcp-client-id: -- ipv4.dhcp-iaid: -- ipv4.dhcp-timeout: 0 (default) ipv4.dhcp-send-hostname: yes ipv4.dhcp-hostname: -- ipv4.dhcp-fqdn: -- ipv4.dhcp-hostname-flags: 0x0 (none) ipv4.never-default: no ipv4.may-fail: yes ipv4.dad-timeout: -1 (default) ipv4.dhcp-vendor-class-identifier: -- ipv4.dhcp-reject-servers: -- ipv6.method: auto ipv6.dns: -- ipv6.dns-search: -- ipv6.dns-options: -- ipv6.dns-priority: 0 ipv6.addresses: -- ipv6.gateway: -- ipv6.routes: -- ipv6.route-metric: -1 ipv6.route-table: 0 (unspec) ipv6.routing-rules: -- ipv6.ignore-auto-routes: no ipv6.ignore-auto-dns: no ipv6.never-default: no ipv6.may-fail: yes ipv6.ip6-privacy: -1 (unknown) ipv6.addr-gen-mode: stable-privacy ipv6.ra-timeout: 0 (default) ipv6.dhcp-duid: -- ipv6.dhcp-iaid: -- ipv6.dhcp-timeout: 0 (default) ipv6.dhcp-send-hostname: yes ipv6.dhcp-hostname: -- ipv6.dhcp-hostname-flags: 0x0 (none) ipv6.token: -- proxy.method: none proxy.browser-only: no proxy.pac-url: -- proxy.pac-script: -- GENERAL.NAME: Wired connection 3 GENERAL.UUID: f4b3782e-a253-3d50-828f-9936798f6f41 GENERAL.DEVICES: enp5s0 GENERAL.IP-IFACE: enp5s0 GENERAL.STATE: activated GENERAL.DEFAULT: no GENERAL.DEFAULT6: no GENERAL.SPEC-OBJECT: -- GENERAL.VPN: no GENERAL.DBUS-PATH: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/12 GENERAL.CON-PATH: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Settings/5 GENERAL.ZONE: -- GENERAL.MASTER-PATH: -- IP4.ADDRESS[1]: 192.168.200.78/24 IP4.GATEWAY: 192.168.200.254 IP4.ROUTE[1]: dst = 0.0.0.0/0, nh = 192.168.200.254, mt = 102 IP4.ROUTE[2]: dst = 192.168.200.0/24, nh = 0.0.0.0, mt = 102 IP4.DNS[1]: 192.168.200.253 DHCP4.OPTION[1]: dhcp_lease_time = 86400 DHCP4.OPTION[2]: dhcp_server_identifier = 192.168.200.254 DHCP4.OPTION[3]: domain_name_servers = 192.168.200.253 DHCP4.OPTION[4]: expiry = 1632386625 DHCP4.OPTION[5]: ip_address = 192.168.200.78 DHCP4.OPTION[6]: requested_broadcast_address = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[7]: requested_domain_name = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[8]: requested_domain_name_servers = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[9]: requested_domain_search = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[10]: requested_host_name = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[11]: requested_interface_mtu = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[12]: requested_ms_classless_static_routes = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[13]: requested_nis_domain = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[14]: requested_nis_servers = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[15]: requested_ntp_servers = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[16]: requested_rfc3442_classless_static_routes = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[17]: requested_root_path = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[18]: requested_routers = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[19]: requested_static_routes = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[20]: requested_subnet_mask = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[21]: requested_time_offset = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[22]: requested_wpad = 1 DHCP4.OPTION[23]: routers = 192.168.200.254 DHCP4.OPTION[24]: subnet_mask = 255.255.255.0 IP6.ADDRESS[1]: fe80::fa22:88ee:e229:6c83/64 IP6.GATEWAY: -- IP6.ROUTE[1]: dst = fe80::/64, nh = ::, mt = 102 (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #14) > (In reply to Laurent Vivier from comment #13) > > (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #12) > > > (In reply to Laurent Vivier from comment #11) > > > > (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #9) > > > > > The issue can be easily reproduced by live migration between rhel8.4.0 and > > > > > rhel8.5.0, almost 100% reproduce ratio. > > > > > > > > > > For steps and package version, pls refer to > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999927#c0, just change win10 > > > > > guest to rhel8.4.0 guest. > > > > > > > > > > # ifconfig > > > > > enp1s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > > > inet 10.73.74.5 netmask 255.255.252.0 broadcast 10.73.75.255 > > > > > inet6 2620:52:0:4948:f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid > > > > > 0x0<global> > > > > > inet6 fe80::f68e:38ff:fec3:8080 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > > > > ether f4:8e:38:c3:80:80 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > > > RX packets 7582 bytes 548637 (535.7 KiB) > > > > > RX errors 0 dropped 169 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > > > TX packets 151 bytes 15631 (15.2 KiB) > > > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > > > > > enp4s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > > > inet 192.168.200.222 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > > > > > 192.168.200.255 > > > > > inet6 fe80::e9e9:9c38:3fb5:bd29 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > > > > inet6 2001::6398:cd12:a87c:754c prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> > > > > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > > > RX packets 126 bytes 15440 (15.0 KiB) > > > > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > > > TX packets 44 bytes 7372 (7.1 KiB) > > > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > > > > > enp4s0nsby: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > > > RX packets 198 bytes 23023 (22.4 KiB) > > > > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > > > TX packets 52 bytes 9280 (9.0 KiB) > > > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > > > > > enp5s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > > > inet 192.168.200.223 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > > > > > 192.168.200.255 > > > > > inet6 fe80::9c3c:b999:e0b6:65f3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > > > > > ether 52:54:00:aa:8c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > > > RX packets 8 bytes 1640 (1.6 KiB) > > > > > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > > > > > TX packets 4 bytes 1112 (1.0 KiB) > > > > > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > > > > > Could you check you DON'T have the file > > > > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0 ? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, only ifcfg-enp1s0 file exists. > > > > > > > > > # cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ > > > # ls > > > ifcfg-enp1s0 > > > # cat ifcfg-enp1s0 > > > TYPE=Ethernet > > > PROXY_METHOD=none > > > BROWSER_ONLY=no > > > BOOTPROTO=dhcp > > > DEFROUTE=yes > > > IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no > > > IPV6INIT=yes > > > IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes > > > IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes > > > IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no > > > NAME=enp1s0 > > > UUID=d7c9441b-de89-4b4f-84c1-69b88ff06c38 > > > DEVICE=enp1s0 > > > ONBOOT=yes > > > > Thanks > > > > > > This is really weird. Who configure enp4s0 and enp5s0 then? > > > > Hi Laurent, > > Please note the additional info in comment 0, my environment is the same > with that. > (3) The PF is connected to a private switch that I have configured with DHCP > and VLAN services. > The switch configure details is in the attachment. > > > > > Do you have results for "nmcli con show enp4s0 enp5s0"? > > # nmcli c show > NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE > > Wired connection 2 52fbcc8b-0f0f-3553-a693-aa3ab0052240 ethernet > enp4s0nsby > enp1s0 d7c9441b-de89-4b4f-84c1-69b88ff06c38 ethernet enp1s0 > > Wired connection 1 b8269223-09ba-3433-b75f-638e3f87d4c7 ethernet enp4s0 > > Wired connection 3 f4b3782e-a253-3d50-828f-9936798f6f41 ethernet enp5s0 > So IP addresses are assigned by the configuration defined in NetworkManager. There is nothing we can do at qemu or kernel level to prevent that. If you didn't configure manually these connections I think there is a bug somewhere in NetworkManager or in some configuration scripts. Perhaps "journalctl -t NetworkManager" can give some hints. Perhaps you can avoid the problem by adding enp4s0nsby and enp5s0 to the NetworkManager unmanaged device list? cat > /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/99-unmanaged-devices.conf <<EOF [keyfile] unmanaged-devices=interface-name:enp4s0nsby;interface-name:enp5s0 EOF systemctl reload NetworkManager nmcli device status (In reply to Laurent Vivier from comment #15) > > > > > Do you have results for "nmcli con show enp4s0 enp5s0"? > > > > # nmcli c show > > NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE > > > > Wired connection 2 52fbcc8b-0f0f-3553-a693-aa3ab0052240 ethernet > > enp4s0nsby > > enp1s0 d7c9441b-de89-4b4f-84c1-69b88ff06c38 ethernet enp1s0 > > > > Wired connection 1 b8269223-09ba-3433-b75f-638e3f87d4c7 ethernet enp4s0 > > > > Wired connection 3 f4b3782e-a253-3d50-828f-9936798f6f41 ethernet enp5s0 > > > > So IP addresses are assigned by the configuration defined in NetworkManager. > There is nothing we can do at qemu or kernel level to prevent that. > > If you didn't configure manually these connections I think there is a bug > somewhere in NetworkManager or in some configuration scripts. > > Perhaps "journalctl -t NetworkManager" can give some hints. Yes, you are right. There are indeed two IP assignment for enp5s0 in the output of "journalctl -t NetworkManager". And I didn't configure connections manually. Sep 25 17:43:07 vm-74-31.lab.eng.pek2.redhat.com NetworkManager[860]: <info> [1632562987.5009] dhcp4 (enp5s0): state changed unknown -> bound, address=192.168.200.117 Sep 25 17:43:46 vm-74-31.lab.eng.pek2.redhat.com NetworkManager[860]: <info> [1632563026.8044] dhcp4 (enp5s0): state changed unknown -> bound, address=192.168.200.181 I have attached the whole output. > > Perhaps you can avoid the problem by adding enp4s0nsby and enp5s0 to the > NetworkManager unmanaged device list? > > cat > /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/99-unmanaged-devices.conf <<EOF > [keyfile] > unmanaged-devices=interface-name:enp4s0nsby;interface-name:enp5s0 > EOF > > systemctl reload NetworkManager > > nmcli device status Yes, after this, the enp5s0 will not be assigned IP. enp1s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 10.73.74.31 netmask 255.255.252.0 broadcast 10.73.75.255 inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fe00:8585 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether 52:54:00:00:85:85 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 919 bytes 66420 (64.8 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 21 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 122 bytes 14507 (14.1 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 enp4s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.200.115 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.200.255 inet6 2001::aa6f:7c28:3f56:1bb prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global> inet6 fe80::5a73:907e:2c13:e696 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether 52:54:00:aa:1c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 54 bytes 6249 (6.1 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 47 bytes 5002 (4.8 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 enp4s0nsby: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::5054:ff:feaa:1cef prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether 52:54:00:aa:1c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 87 bytes 10531 (10.2 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 13 bytes 1400 (1.3 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 enp5s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::5054:ff:feaa:1cef prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> ether 52:54:00:aa:1c:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 So now I'd like to confirm with you I should file a bug for NetworkManager, right? (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #16) ... > So now I'd like to confirm with you I should file a bug for NetworkManager, > right? You can re-assign this bug to NetworkManager component to have at least an analysis of the cause of the problem. After that we will know if the problem comes from NM or from something in the kernel or in the OS. (In reply to Laurent Vivier from comment #17) > (In reply to Yanhui Ma from comment #16) > ... > > So now I'd like to confirm with you I should file a bug for NetworkManager, > > right? > > You can re-assign this bug to NetworkManager component to have at least an > analysis of the cause of the problem. > > After that we will know if the problem comes from NM or from something in > the kernel or in the OS. Done, thank you very much for your all analysis. |