Bug 1974000

Summary:	linux-system-roles.selinux fails linit rules role-name and unnamed-task
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Rodrique Heron <rheron>
Component:	rhel-system-roles	Assignee:	Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	David Jež <djez>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.4	CC:	djez, jharuda, nhosoi, pkettman, spetrosi
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	8.6	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	role:selinux
Fixed In Version:	rhel-system-roles-1.11.0-1.el8	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2021675 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-05-10 14:12:08 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2021675

Description Rodrique Heron 2021-06-19 18:19:18 UTC

linux-system-roles.selinux fails linit rules role-name and unnamed-task


How reproducible:


Run ansible-lint aginst a playbook that calls linux-system-roles.selinux

Actual results:

roles/linux-system-roles.selinux/meta/main.yml:0: role-name Role name linux-system-roles.selinux does not match ``^+$`` pattern
roles/linux-system-roles.selinux/tasks/main.yml:57: unnamed-task All tasks should be named


Expected results:


No lint errors

Comment 3 Rich Megginson 2021-11-09 21:55:03 UTC

Note - all lint errors have been fixed except the following:
skip_list:
- '106'  # role name does not match pattern
- '701'  # ignore meta/requirements.yml

We cannot "fix" these, we just have to suppress them

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-10 14:12:08 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (rhel-system-roles bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:1896

Comment 16 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 01:34:38 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 365 days