Bug 197639

Summary: the conjuction of 0x0d31 + 0x0d4d + 0x200d need be added in the font file of malayalam
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Liang Zhang <lizhang>
Component: fonts-indicAssignee: Darshan Santani <dsantani>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: apeter, eng-i18n-bugs, mshao
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 2.0.1-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-11 06:42:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch attached
none
Screenshot showing the expected behaviour
none
lohit_ml.ttf none

Description Liang Zhang 2006-07-05 06:54:34 UTC 
Description of problem:
The conjuction of  0x0d31 + 0x0d4d + 0x200d is existing in real world, but it is
not existing in our font file of malayalam.
The conjuction of  0x0d31 + 0x0d4d + 0x200d need be added in the GSUB table of
the font file of malayalam. The glyph of this conjuction is the same as the
conjuction of  0x0d30 + 0x0d4d + 0x200d.
Comment 1 Darshan Santani 2006-08-08 12:52:27 UTC 
Created attachment 133783 [details]
Patch attached

Patch has been attached to resolve the issue.
Comment 2 Darshan Santani 2006-08-08 12:55:37 UTC 
Created attachment 133784 [details]
Screenshot showing the expected behaviour 

Attached screenshot showing the expected behaviour
Comment 3 Darshan Santani 2006-08-08 12:58:05 UTC 
Created attachment 133785 [details]
lohit_ml.ttf

Ani, I am attaching the ttf file, Can you just test it with the modified file
and leave your comments. Thanks in advance.
Comment 4 Leon Ho 2006-08-17 07:19:07 UTC 
built in fonts-indic-2.0.1-1
Comment 5 Ani Peter 2006-08-31 13:33:55 UTC 
Before Darshan leaving, had discussion with him wanted to have :

(U+0d30) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) and (U+0d31) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) must give the
same glyph.

In the old font, (U+0d30) + (U+0d4d) + (U+200d) was working but new font
(U+200d) is not present in the keyboard and hence not able to generate the output.

Regards
Ani