Bug 1976513

Summary: Digikam Fails to run in 8.4
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: centosbugs2019
Component: digikamAssignee: Rex Dieter <rdieter>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel8CC: alekcejk, kde-sig, me, rdieter, smparrish, than, thomas, viktor.vix.jancik
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-08-04 19:52:39 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description centosbugs2019 2021-06-26 19:47:51 UTC 
Description of problem:

digikam errors out.

 /usr/bin/digikam
/usr/bin/digikam: symbol lookup error: /lib64/libdigikamcore.so.6.2.0: undefined symbol: _ZN9KContacts13AddresseeListC1ERKS0_

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

Install and try to run :

Installing:
 digikam                           x86_64                      6.2.0-1.el8.1                         epel                       93 M
Installing dependencies:
 digikam-libs                      x86_64                      6.2.0-1.el8.1                         epel                       11 M
Installing weak dependencies:
 digikam-doc                       noarch                      6.2.0-1.el8.1                         epel                       34 k




Steps to Reproduce:
1. install
2. run


Actual results:

It does not run

Expected results:

IT RUNS

Additional info:
Comment 1 Thomas Doczkal 2021-07-16 07:50:14 UTC 
Seeing the same Error on Centos 8 Stream

/usr/bin/digikam
digikam: symbol lookup error: /lib64/libdigikamcore.so.6.2.0: undefined symbol: _ZN9KContacts13AddresseeListC1ERKS0_

Linux Hostname.example.net 5.13.0-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jun 27 19:44:44 EDT 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Comment 2 Rex Dieter 2021-08-04 19:52:39 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1891610 ***