Bug 197688
| Summary: | Review Request: inotify-tools - Command line utilities for inotify | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dawid Gajownik <gajownik> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Michael J Knox <michael> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | adel.gadllah, mmckinst, panemade, splewako |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | gwync:
fedora-cvs+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | inotify-tools-3.14-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-08-01 16:06:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 163779 | ||
|
Description
Dawid Gajownik
2006-07-05 15:16:03 UTC
Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored
Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull
MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint shows no error.
- MUST: dist tag is present.
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matching the base package inotify-tools, in the
format inotify-tools.spec.
- MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
- MUST: This package includes License file COPYING.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (8053f441fc3fe0f0c73cf483399da17b)
- MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
- MUST: This package used macros.
- MUST: Document files are included like README.
- MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
* Source URL is present and working.
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* BuildRequires is correct
Thanks for the review! Today was released new version so here's an updated package: http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/inotify-tools.spec http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/inotify-tools-2.2-1.src.rpm * Thu Jul 6 2006 Dawid Gajownik <gajownik[AT]gmail.com> - 2.2-1 - New version 2.2 - Update URL and description - Add man pages == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull
* MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint shows no error.
- MUST: dist tag is present.
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matching the base package inotify-tools, in the
format inotify-tools.spec.
- MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
- MUST: This package includes License file COPYING.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (0ca1dd7a9bb0c6d0bbd084d8436b850f)
- MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
- MUST: This package used macros.
- MUST: Document files are included like README.
- MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
* Source URL is present and working.
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* BuildRequires is correct
I've e-mailed upstream about this compilation warning and he gave me instructions how to fix it :-) http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/inotify-tools.spec http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/inotify-tools-2.2-2.src.rpm * Thu Jul 6 2006 Dawid Gajownik <gajownik[AT]gmail.com> - 2.2-2 - Fix compilation warnings I will do the review for this submission. Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source inotify-tools-2.2.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK Notes: You should use http://download.sourceforge.com/ and not one of the mirrors. e.g. Source0: http://download.sourceforge.com/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Fix that up and I can't see any reason for not approving this. Sorry for the delay - I was on a vacation. I chose mirror because there are sometimes problems with connecting to download.sourceforge.net. * Mon Jul 31 2006 Dawid Gajownik <gajownik[AT]gmail.com> - 2.2-3 - Fix URL http://gajownik.zspswidwin.pl/inotify-tools.spec http://gajownik.zspswidwin.pl/inotify-tools-2.2-3.src.rpm Thanks for the review! Looks good. APPROVED. Please remember to close this review request once imported into CVS and built. Package was built fine in devel :) Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: inotify-tools New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: drago01 mmckinst InitialCC: drago01 I emailed Adel about an EPEL 5 and 6 version of inotify-tools. He's not a RHEL or CentOS user but I am so I'll take care of the EPEL 5 and 6 branch. The kernel for EPEL 4 (2.6.9) does not have inotify support which was added in 2.6.13 so leaving el4 off the branch list is intentional. (In reply to comment #9) > Package Change Request > ====================== > Package Name: inotify-tools > New Branches: el5 el6 > Owners: drago01 mmckinst > InitialCC: drago01 > > I emailed Adel about an EPEL 5 and 6 version of inotify-tools. He's not a RHEL > or CentOS user but I am so I'll take care of the EPEL 5 and 6 branch. The > kernel for EPEL 4 (2.6.9) does not have inotify support which was added in > 2.6.13 so leaving el4 off the branch list is intentional. Which means that this line > Owners: drago01 mmckinst Should be > Owners: mmckinst drago01 (i.e having you as the primary maintainer) I've processed the request with the owners switched around. Git done (by process-git-requests). inotify-tools-3.14-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/inotify-tools-3.14-1.el5 inotify-tools-3.14-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. inotify-tools-3.13-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/inotify-tools-3.13-3.el6 Package inotify-tools-3.14-1.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing inotify-tools-3.14-1.el6' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/inotify-tools-3.14-1.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback). inotify-tools-3.14-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: inotify-tools New Branches: epel7 Owners: mmckinst drago01 Git done (by process-git-requests). |