Bug 1979976
Summary: | update network settings in satellite, correcttly after they were chanaged manually on the server. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Stefan Nemeth <snemeth> |
Component: | Hosts | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.9.0 | CC: | aruzicka, inecas |
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | Unused | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-08-02 13:50:17 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Stefan Nemeth
2021-07-07 14:21:54 UTC
This is more of a bug vs RFE, reformatting. For some reason, the Nic parsed from the facts ended up being an instance of Nic::Base instead of Nic::Managed or Nic::Bond, that is the source of the issue. Given this is an existing state of the customer DB, we should provide a cleanup script/rake task that handles all interfaces like that. The next steps we agreed on: 0) We need the reproducer, ideally in form of host facts so we can try to import them and get the Nic::Base record created 1) We need to prevent the issue by adding the abstract class definition to Nic::Base class, such instances should never be saved 2) Since there are databases that contain already such value, we'll provide a new check for the foreman-maintain (satellite-maintain) that will detect such objects and will convert those to Nic::Managed Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team. Thank you. We have reviewed this and the bug shouldn't be closed. As stated in comment 5, if at least need to provide something that will help to fix the data in the database. Next step is to fix the root cause, which will be more complicated, since we don't have reliable reproducer yet. I'm sorry for the confusion on our side. Per #10 this seems to got fixed in 6.13 so I'll go ahead and close this. If the issue comes back, feel free to reopen. |