Bug 1980357

Summary: Getting the alert "V4SubnetAllocationThresholdExceeded" in newly installed cluster, Where subnet allocation is not more then 80%
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Ashish Sharma <ashsharm>
Component: NetworkingAssignee: Aniket Bhat <anbhat>
Networking sub component: ovn-kubernetes QA Contact: zhaozhanqi <zzhao>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA Docs Contact:
Severity: high    
Priority: unspecified CC: ableisch, aconstan, anbhat, bbennett, dmoessne, ebrizuel, jrosenta, oarribas, openshift-bugs-escalate, surya, takirby, zzhao
Version: 4.7   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.9.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1999638 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-10-18 17:38:24 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1999638    

Description Ashish Sharma 2021-07-08 13:12:26 UTC
Description of problem:
Cluster Version:-OCP 4.7.18
Network Plugin:- OVN-kubernetes
Issue:-
Cu is using 10.195.64.0/19 cidr with hostprefix /24 which allows to add 32 nodes, He added 13 nodes which is not 80% of 32, still he is getting V4SubnetAllocationThresholdExceeded alert


 So his query is why he is getting this alert ,
metric for one master : ovnkube_master_allocated_v4_host_subnets shows allocated subnet is 26 allocated.





Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

I have tried same metric query in quick lab in which i have added 6 nodes still i am getting 9 allocated subnet.



Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Aniket Bhat 2021-07-12 16:46:16 UTC
This does look like a purely metrics related issue. Has the CU tried creating additional nodes once the alert starts firing? Does that fail? Looking at the code, it looks like the subnet allocation may still happen just fine.

Comment 5 Aniket Bhat 2021-07-13 02:07:51 UTC
Posted https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/pull/2333 that should fix the issue. Also, I can confirm that the actual subnet allocation goes thru' just fine when you add additional nodes after the spurious alert.

Comment 11 Surya Seetharaman 2021-07-15 07:28:27 UTC
Downstream fix: https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/605

Comment 17 Ezequiel Hector Brizuela 2021-07-21 03:28:11 UTC
ACK, Thank you!.

Comment 20 zhaozhanqi 2021-07-30 04:41:00 UTC
Verified this bug on 4.9.0-0.nightly-2021-07-29-103526

Reproduced this issue on 4.8.3

setup cluster with the following config with 4.8.3 version

~~~
networking:
  clusterNetwork:
  - cidr: 10.195.64.0/19 
    hostPrefix: 23 
  networkType: OVNKubernetes 
~~~

this can create at most 15 nodes. 

1. Create 3 master and 6 workers
2. after reboot all master worker
3. Check the alert with following command:

#token=`oc -n openshift-monitoring sa get-token prometheus-k8s`
# oc -n openshift-monitoring exec -c prometheus prometheus-k8s-1  -- curl -k -H "Authorization: Bearer $token" https://alertmanager-main.openshift-monitoring.svc:9094/api/v2/alerts?filter={alertname="V4SubnetAllocationThresholdExceeded"}
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100   956  100   956    0     0  30838      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 30838
[{"annotations":{"message":"More than 80% of v4 subnets available to assign to the nodes are allocated. Current v4 subnet allocation percentage is 112.5\n"},"endsAt":"2021-07-30T02:03:45.223Z","fingerprint":"7099016df0883a8c","receivers":[{"name":"Default"}],"startsAt":"2021-07-30T01:42:45.223Z","status":{"inhibitedBy":[],"silencedBy":[],"state":"active"},"updatedAt":"2021-07-30T01:59:45.232Z","generatorURL":"https://prometheus-k8s-openshift-monitoring.apps.zzhaobug28.qe.devcluster.openshift.com/graph?g0.expr=ovnkube_master_allocated_v4_host_subnets+%2F+ovnkube_master_num_v4_host_subnets+%2A+100+%3E+80\u0026g0.tab=1","labels":{"alertname":"V4SubnetAllocationThresholdExceeded","container":"kube-rbac-proxy","endpoint":"metrics","instance":"10.0.179.203:9102","job":"ovnkube-master","namespace":"openshift-ovn-kubernetes","pod":"ovnkube-master-4x9z4","prometheus":"openshift-monitoring/k8s","service":"ovn-kubernetes-master","severity":"warning"}}]

4. Upgrade cluster to 4.9.0-0.nightly-2021-07-29-103526

5. Check step3 again, the alert disappeared. 

# oc -n openshift-monitoring exec -c prometheus prometheus-k8s-1  -- curl -k -H "Authorization: Bearer $token" https://alertmanager-main.openshift-monitoring.svc:9094/api/v2/alerts?filter={alertname="V4SubnetAllocationThresholdExceeded"}
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100     3  100     3    0     0    100      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--   100
[]

Comment 28 errata-xmlrpc 2021-10-18 17:38:24 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.9.0 bug fix and security update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:3759