Bug 198079
Summary: | Graphviz broken: font error | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marco <oo_guru> | ||||
Component: | graphviz | Assignee: | Jima <jima> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5 | CC: | alex, extras-qa, jima | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | 2.8-4.fc5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-09-15 18:08:35 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Marco
2006-07-09 08:14:12 UTC
Created attachment 132122 [details]
A sample DOT file to reproduce the problem
Latest upgrade graphviz-2.8-4.fc5 (just appeared in repositories) appears to fix this. I can't duplicate this error with the new package. I admit, I'm going to be rather amused if I _accidentally_ fixed this bug. (In reply to comment #3) > I admit, I'm going to be rather amused if I _accidentally_ fixed this bug. I suspect it was a side-effect (rather like the missing /usr/bin/lefty) of fixing the package's broken spec file. Try and reproduce it yourself, you shouldn't be able to... As I don't have any data to pump into graphviz (and wouldn't know it if the results looked correct), I'll take your word for it. You know the app better than I. Taking ownership of bug and closing it out. Thanks again, Alex. There is an attachment below that you simply save and pump into dot using the command line mentioned in comment #0, but only if you're curious. ;) (By the way, shouldn't we move Oliver to the Cc field, just in case, since the package isn't officially orphaned? I've seen other maintainers do that.) |