Bug 1982774

Summary:	Please branch and build atool for EPEL8
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component:	atool	Assignee:	Filipe Rosset <rosset.filipe>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel8	CC:	lef, rosset.filipe
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	atool-0.39.0-19.el9 atool-0.39.0-19.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-04-09 17:36:42 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423

Description Davide Cavalca 2021-07-15 16:40:07 UTC

Hi,

I am using CentOS Stream 8 and am using various packages in the EPEL[1] 
repository. I am interested in seeing atool added to EPEL 8.

Would it be possible for you to maintain the package? While EPEL 
is more conservative in package maintenance[2][3], it does allow for
updates to later versions when needed.

I am happy to co-maintain (FAS: dcavalca); additionally, EPEL now has a packaging team[4] that can help co-maintain branches (FAS group: epel-packagers-sig), that can be added with either commit access or collaborator access to epel* branches (if it's not desired that they have access to the rawhide and f* branches).

The EPEL team appreciate your help with EPEL.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies

[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ

[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Packagers

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2022-01-19 21:42:49 UTC

Will you be able to branch and build atool in epel8?
The EPEL Packaging SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel8.

Comment 2 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2022-02-08 12:05:31 UTC

This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 3 Filipe Rosset 2022-03-30 19:15:16 UTC

work in progress

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43290
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43291
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43292

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-04-01 05:13:46 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1bff30d070 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1bff30d070

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-04-01 05:13:47 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3608bce53b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3608bce53b

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-04-02 03:26:48 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1bff30d070 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1bff30d070

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-04-02 03:41:57 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3608bce53b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3608bce53b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-04-09 17:36:42 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1bff30d070 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-04-09 18:00:07 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3608bce53b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.