Bug 1983626
| Summary: | [ovn] Exclude Chassis_Private table from unconditional monitoring | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Fast Datapath | Reporter: | Daniel Alvarez Sanchez <dalvarez> |
| Component: | ovn2.13 | Assignee: | OVN Team <ovnteam> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Jianlin Shi <jishi> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | FDP 21.B | CC: | ctrautma, dceara, ihrachys, jiji, mmichels, ralongi |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mmichels:
needinfo?
(dalvarez) |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-07-28 17:12:13 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Daniel Alvarez Sanchez
2021-07-19 09:22:06 UTC
(In reply to Daniel Alvarez Sanchez from comment #0) > OpenStack makes use of the Chassis_Private table to avoid unnecessary > notifications being broadcasted to all SB connections. This makes a great > impact on the scale when conditional monitoring is enabled. > > However, the benefits of this table are lost when ovn-monitor-all is set to > True. > > This BZ is to request the exclusion of Chassis_Private for the unconditional > monitoring that way that we can still benefit from the use of this table > (eg. liveness checks). We need some additional investigation to see if this is possible. Currently Chassis_Private is included in the same monitor as all other tables. Conditional monitoring is enabled/disabled per-monitor so it might not be enough to bypass ovn-monitor-all for Chassis_Private. We might need a separate monitor. Hi, this issue was discussed during today's OVN core team meeting. We're still at a point where trying to have such conditional monitoring for only one table but unconditional monitoring for everything else is quite a difficult ask. However, OVSDB in particular has evolved quite a bit and we're curious if this same issue is really that much of a problem when using ovs2.17 or later. Thanks. No response in 10 months. Closing. |