Bug 198402

Summary: Package privoxy lacks IPv6 support
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Peter Vrabec <pvrabec>
Component: privoxyAssignee: Karsten Hopp <karsten>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: dkopecek, mbacovsk, rvokal, triage
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: bzcl34nup
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-07 00:37:35 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 195271    
Attachments:
Description Flags
IPv6 support, new option in ./configure (--enable-ipv6)
none
Fixed +- lines in loadcfg.c comment
none
Fixed stupid address family recognition
none
Fixed bugs in mask_cmp none

Description Peter Vrabec 2006-07-11 10:27:21 UTC 
This bug was reported automaticaly in connection with IPv6 project.
Our aim is to support IPv6 in all Fedora Core packages so FC6 and RHEL5 will be ready for IPv6.
			
This package seems to lack IPv6 support as is illustrated in attached log.
	
Here follows part of scanning log (grep -r F_INET *)/up to 30 lines: 

/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/jbsockets.c:321:   inaddr.sin_family      = AF_INET;
/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/jbsockets.c:574:   inaddr.sin_family      = AF_INET;
/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/jbsockets.c:595:   fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/jbsockets.c:720:                      sizeof(server.sin_addr), AF_INET,
/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/jbsockets.c:725:                      sizeof(server.sin_addr), AF_INET,
/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/jbsockets.c:729:                               sizeof(server.sin_addr), AF_INET,
/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/jbsockets.c:741:                           sizeof(server.sin_addr), AF_INET);
/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/jbsockets.c:745:                           sizeof(server.sin_addr), AF_INET);
/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/jbsockets.c:836:      if (hostp->h_addrtype != AF_INET)
/privoxy-3.0.3-stable/amiga.c:114:      local_csp->cfd=ObtainSocket(local_csp->cfd, AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
Comment 1 Daniel Kopeček 2006-09-13 20:01:22 UTC 
Created attachment 136199 [details]
IPv6 support, new option in ./configure (--enable-ipv6)
Comment 2 Daniel Kopeček 2006-09-13 20:42:27 UTC 
I haven't tested everything, but I'll go thru it again and eventually send a 
new patch. In case somebody have complaints or have found a bug, I'll rework it 
accordingly.
Comment 3 Daniel Kopeček 2006-09-14 08:33:02 UTC 
Created attachment 136239 [details]
Fixed +- lines in loadcfg.c comment
Comment 4 Daniel Kopeček 2006-09-26 21:50:12 UTC 
Created attachment 137176 [details]
Fixed stupid address family recognition
Comment 5 Daniel Kopeček 2006-11-19 12:49:28 UTC 
Created attachment 141583 [details]
Fixed bugs in mask_cmp
Comment 6 Bug Zapper 2008-04-03 17:41:33 UTC 
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported
against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no
longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are
flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer
maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now,
we will automatically close it.

If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or
rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change
the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version
or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.)

Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled
these issues to this point.

The process we're following is outlined here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp

We will be following the process here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this
doesn't happen again.
Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2008-05-07 00:37:34 UTC 
This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was
first requested. As a result we are closing it.

If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora
version please feel free to reopen it against that version.

The process we're following is outlined here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp